Hybrid approach in patients with aortic valve disease and concomitant coronary heart disease: retrospective study
Kostiantyn Boyko1, Borys Todurov1, Andrii Khokhlov2
1HEART INSTITUTE MINISTRY OF HEALTH OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE; SHUPYK NATIONAL HEALTHCARE UNIVERSITY OF UKRAINE, KYIV, UKRAINE.
Insights
The hybrid approach combining aortic valve replacement (AVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) shows similar complication rates to traditional surgery. Patients experienced a better pain index six months post-procedure.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Rehabilitation
Background:
- Coronary heart disease (CHD) and aortic valve disease often coexist, necessitating complex treatment strategies.
- Traditional treatment involves separate or staged interventions, potentially increasing patient burden and recovery time.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid approach combining aortic valve replacement (AVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
- To compare outcomes of the hybrid AVR + PCI approach versus AVR + coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with CHD and aortic valve disease.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 130 adult patients undergoing AVR with myocardial revascularization between 2018-2022.
- Group 1: 51 patients (AVR + PCI); Group 2: 79 patients (AVR + CABG).
- Quality of life assessed using the Short Form 36 Survey (SF-36) at 6 and 12 months post-procedure.
Main Results:
- The AVR + PCI group demonstrated significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass and aorta cross-clamping times (1.5x and 1.4x lower, respectively) compared to the AVR + CABG group (p=0.0001).
- At 6 months, patients in the AVR + PCI group reported a significantly better SF-36 pain index (13.5% higher, p=0.017).
- No significant differences were observed in other SF-36 quality of life indicators between the groups.
Conclusions:
- The hybrid approach (AVR + PCI) offers comparable postoperative complication rates to the conventional surgical approach (AVR + CABG).
- Patients undergoing the hybrid intervention experienced improved pain scores at six months post-procedure.
- This hybrid strategy represents a viable and potentially beneficial treatment option for select patients with combined CHD and aortic valve disease.
Objective:
Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of the hybrid approach, which involves the combination of aortic valve replacement (AVR) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in patients with CHD and aortic valve disease..
Patients And Methods:
Materials and Methods: For this study, analysis of medical records of adult patients (over 18 years old) who underwent AVR along with myocardial revascularization at the State Institution "Heart Institute Ministry of Health of Ukraine" in the period from 2018 to 2022 was carried out. Quality of life was assessed in 6 and 12 months after AVR with myocardial revascularization using Short Form 36 Survey (SF-36).
Results:
Results: We selected 130 patients who underwent AVR together with myocardial revascularization (first group (n=51) - a combination of AVR and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI); second group (n=79) - a combination of AVR and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass and aorta cross clamping in first group was recorded by 1.5 times and by 1.4 times significantly lower compared to the second group (p=0.0001). The pain index after 6 months according to the SF-36 questionnaire was found to be 13.5% (p=0.017) significantly higher in patients of the first group compared to the second group, while other indicators did not differ among groups.
Conclusion:
Conclusions: Patients with the hybrid approach of treatment were characterized by a similar level of postoperative complications with the surgical group. At the same time, this cohort of patients had a better SF-36 pain index in 6 months after the hybrid intervention.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies


