Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Aggregation of Adverse Event Terms for Signal Detection and Labeling in Clinical Trials
Richard C Zink1,2, Rebecca Lyzinski3, Geoffrey Mann3
1JMP Statistical Discovery LLC, 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC, 27513, USA. richard.zink@jmp.com.
Abstract:
The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was developed in the mid-to-late 1990s to address the shortcomings of other medical dictionaries used for coding adverse events. Since that time, MedDRA has become the required coding dictionary for major regulatory authorities involved with the International Council for Harmonisation. Due to the increased specificity and significant increase in terminology over time, several approaches have been developed to aggregate terms for the purposes of signal detection and labeling. We present the approaches taken and suggested to date to aggregate preferred terms into meaningful medical concepts. We discuss the pros and cons of different methods in which to group terms, and illustrate that analyses performed for MedDRA preferred terms can also be conducted using aggregated terms. However, some features of adverse events available at the preferred term level, such as severity and relationship to study therapy, require additional consideration for analysis. In the last 25 years, the pendulum for medical coding is swinging in the other direction. Faced with a deluge of preferred terms, users of MedDRA are developing new ways in which to collapse terms into medical concepts. The ability to identify safety concerns and communicate important data in drug labels effectively and consistently are at risk, particularly with the introduction of new aggregations.
Insights
As the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) grows, new methods aggregate terms into medical concepts for drug safety signal detection and labeling. This aggregation is crucial for managing vast terminology and ensuring clear communication of safety data.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety
- Medical Terminology and Coding Systems
- Regulatory Science
Background:
- The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was established to standardize adverse event coding.
- MedDRA is now the required dictionary for major regulatory authorities under the International Council for Harmonisation.
- Increasing terminology complexity necessitates methods for term aggregation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present and discuss approaches for aggregating MedDRA preferred terms into meaningful medical concepts.
- To evaluate the pros and cons of different term grouping methods.
- To explore the feasibility of conducting analyses on aggregated terms versus preferred terms.
Main Methods:
- Review and synthesis of existing and proposed methods for aggregating MedDRA terms.
- Comparative analysis of term aggregation strategies.
- Illustrative examples of analyses using aggregated terms.
Main Results:
- Several approaches exist for aggregating MedDRA preferred terms into higher-level medical concepts.
- Analyses can be performed on aggregated terms, but specific features like severity require careful consideration.
- Aggregation aids in managing the growing volume of MedDRA terminology.
Conclusions:
- Aggregating MedDRA terms is essential for effective signal detection and labeling in pharmacovigilance.
- Careful consideration is needed for analyzing specific adverse event features at the aggregated level.
- New aggregation methods are vital for consistent and effective communication of drug safety information.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Cancer Survival Analysis

