Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
Published on: January 6, 2011
Nontechnical Coaching in Academic Surgical Practice-Where Do We Stand and What's Next?
Krishna Unadkat1, Patti M Thorn2, Mary Ann Djonne3
1Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Objective:
To evaluate the potential of nontechnical coaching (NC) as an intervention to enhance professional development, reduce burnout, and improve patient outcomes among attending academic surgeons (AS) in high-pressure surgical environments.
Design:
A narrative review was performed using PubMed to identify and assess studies focused on NC in academic surgery. We evaluated articles addressing the impact, benefits, risks, and barriers associated with NC, with particular attention to coaching frameworks, training programs, and participant feedback.
Setting:
The review encompasses research conducted in various academic surgical settings.
Participants:
Studies primarily involved attending academic surgeons across diverse surgical specialties, especially those experiencing high levels of burnout and decreased job satisfaction.
Results:
Findings indicate that NC offers several benefits for AS. Pilot studies and qualitative surveys suggest that NC can reduce burnout, enhance intraoperative decision-making, and improve patient engagement. Surgeons who participated in NC reported better stress management, increased self-awareness, and improved leadership skills. Moreover, NC appears to foster enhanced team dynamics and, in some cases, may yield fiscal benefits by reducing surgical errors and increasing operational efficiency. However, significant barriers to NC adoption remain, including cultural resistance within surgical departments, time constraints, and concerns regarding the efficacy of NC compared to traditional technical coaching. Additionally, the current evidence is limited by small sample sizes, selection bias, and a lack of standardized, quantitative measures.
Conclusion:
Preliminary evidence supports NC as a promising intervention for enhancing surgeon well-being and patient outcomes. Future research should focus on establishing standardized guidelines for coach training, addressing misconceptions about NC, and designing larger, methodologically robust studies using validated outcomes. Expanding NC could foster a more resilient surgical workforce, ultimately benefiting both surgeons and patients through improved engagement, satisfaction, and quality of care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Standards of Care I
Standards of Care II
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Ultrasound I: Abdominal Ultrasonography
Abdominal ultrasonography, commonly known as abdominal ultrasound, is a vital, non-invasive medical imaging technique widely used in healthcare.
Procedure:
This diagnostic tool allows the clinician to visually inspect internal structures within the abdomen, including vital organs such as the liver, gallbladder, pancreas, kidneys, and spleen.
The abdominal ultrasound process begins with applying a special gel to the patient's skin over the abdomen. This gel enhances the...
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure

