Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Evaluating a whole-school approach to addressing gender-based violence in Scottish secondary schools (Equally Safe at
Claire Hamilton1, Ruth Lewis2, Carolyn Blake2
1MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK Claire.Hamilton@glasgow.ac.uk.
Introduction:
Equally Safe at School (ESAS) is a whole-school intervention to reduce gender-based violence (GBV) in secondary school. ESAS comprises self-assessment, student-led action group, two-tier staff training, curriculum enhancement and policy review. Schools set up key activities in Year 1 and embed them in Year 2. GBV, including sexual harassment, is common in secondary schools and disproportionately affects young women and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer youth.
Methods And Analysis:
We will evaluate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, mechanisms of action and implementation of ESAS. We will recruit 36 schools across Scotland. The evaluation comprises three linked studies:Study 1: Pragmatic cluster randomised trial with 1:1 school allocation to either immediate ESAS intervention start (intervention schools) or 12-month delayed intervention start (control schools). Our primary outcome of student experience of sexual harassment will be measured at 12 months post-randomisation. Analysis of primary and secondary outcomes (student and school level) will be conducted on an intention to treat (ITT) basis comparing schools according to their original allocation.Study 2: Mixed-methods evaluation. Study 2A: Longitudinal follow-up will assess primary, secondary and intermediate outcomes at baseline, 12 months and 24 months of follow-up. Study 2B: Systems and realist-informed process evaluation will assess intervention and control school context, fidelity, dose and reach, acceptability and actor response, and how this varies by school and students. We will also assess implementation processes and mechanisms of action (beneficial or harmful), including if and how change is embedded over time, and if and how ESAS helps schools leverage other assets and resources.Study 3: Economic evaluation to assess the within-trial and longer term cost-effectiveness of ESAS.The methods include surveys in three out of six year groups (Years 2, 4 and 6) in all schools (baseline, 12 months and 24 months of follow-up); interviews with staff, students and other stakeholders; activity observations; brief surveys with key actors and analysis of trial documentation.
Ethics And Dissemination:
Ethical approval by University of Glasgow MVLS Ethics Committee (200220268). Findings will be disseminated via multiple channels to researchers, GBV and education sector stakeholders, study participants and the public.
Trial Registration Number:
ISRCTN29792495.
More Related Videos
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Conduct Disorder
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security: