Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Does an Unintended Durotomy in Metastatic Spine Surgery Lead to Shorter Survival?
Lakshmi Suryateja Gangavarapu1, Hani Chanbour2, Gabriel A Bendfeldt1
1Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Background And Objectives:
Whether unintended durotomy in metastatic spine surgery seeds tumor in the central nervous system (CNS) remains unknown. Our objectives were to (1) determine the rate of unintended durotomy, (2) identify the preoperative and perioperative factors that increase the risk of unintended durotomy, and (3) determine whether unintended durotomy affected local recurrence (LR), any spinal recurrence, and overall survival.
Methods:
A single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery between January 2010 to January 2021 was undertaken. The primary exposure variable was the occurrence of unintended durotomy. Multivariable logistic/linear regression were performed controlling for age, body mass index, tumor size, other organ metastases, and preoperative radiotherapy/chemotherapy.
Results:
Of 354 patients undergoing surgery for extradural spinal metastasis, 19 patients (5.4%) had an unintended durotomy. Preoperatively: No difference was found between patients with and without unintended durotomy regarding basic demographics, comorbidities (P = .645), or tumor histology (P = .642). Preoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy were similar between the 2 groups. Perioperatively: Although patients with unintended durotomy had more costotransversectomies (36.8% vs 12.8%, P = .010), no difference was found in tumor characteristics, operative time (337.4 vs 310.6 minutes, P = .150), blood loss (1012.8 vs 883.8 mL, P = .157), length of stay (6.4 vs 6.9 days, P = .452), or overall reoperation/readmission. Long-term: No difference was seen in CNS spread between those with unintended durotomy and no durotomy (10.5% vs 3.0%, P = .077). LR (5.3% vs 12.2%, P = .712), time to LR (388.0 vs 213.3 ± 359.8 days, log-rank; P = .709), any spinal recurrence (26.3% vs 34.0%, P = .489), overall survival (21.05% vs 34.3%, P = .233), and time to death (466.9 ± 634.7 vs 465.8 ± 665.4 days, log-rank; P = .394) were similar on multivariable Cox regressions.
Conclusion:
In patients undergoing surgery for extradural spinal metastases, 5% had an unintended durotomy, and costotransversectomies were associated with increased risk of an unintended durotomy. Unintended durotomies did not lead to increased LR or shorter survival. Taken together, shortened survival due to seeding tumor into the CNS after an unintended durotomy was not observed.
More Related Videos
04:33Spinal Hernia Repair and Cauda Equina Repositioning After Lumbar Decompression under Three-Dimensional Microscopy: A Case Report and Literature Review
Published on: November 8, 2024
05:17Author Spotlight: Scope of LE-ULBD as a Safe, Effective, and Minimally Invasive Approach to Treat Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Published on: February 9, 2024