Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026
Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
A comparative evaluation of alectinib for ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review
Monica Kharat1, Harshitha Nookala2, Jabez David John3
1Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Queens Hospital Center, New York, NY.
Background:
Lung cancer, a significant global health challenge, notably the non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtype, is a topic of utmost importance. The continuous advancements in NSCLC treatment, especially in the context of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive NSCLC, are of great interest. A thorough review of alectinib's comparative efficacy and safety with other treatment modalities is a crucial step, and the role of clinicians and surgeons is integral in optimizing patient care. This review can also inform neoadjuvant therapies and enhance surgical education, facilitating more informed decision-making processes between surgeons and patients.
Methods:
This comprehensive systematic review results from rigorous screening. Following a rigorous screening process of the PubMed, PubMed Central, and Medline databases by quality assessment and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria filters, 9 relevant articles were identified that directly addressed the research question and provided a holistic understanding of it. The analysis included a total of 1403 patients from 9 different studies. Alectinib was given to 836 patients, while 567 patients received other chemotherapeutic drugs. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of alectinib with other treatment modalities.
Results:
The analysis revealed that alectinib is promising for ALK-positive NSCLC cases, with significantly better efficacy and a positive impact on limiting central nervous system metastases. Alectinib's favorable safety profile, with medically manageable adverse events, provides reassurance about its safety compared with other treatment modalities.
Conclusions:
Alectinib has emerged as a viable, significantly superior treatment option for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The superior efficacy and manageable safety profile are significant; it remains a novel therapy with much potential, such as neoadjuvant therapy, which will make significant strides in patient care of ALK-positive NSCLC. Therefore, it is crucial for healthcare professionals, including surgeons, to be well-versed in alectinib and its potential. This knowledge will empower them and instill confidence in their ability to provide the best care for their patients.
