Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Assessing Urinary Tract Junction Obstruction Defects by Methylene Blue Dye Injection
Published on: October 12, 2017
Second 'pop-off' of fetal giant urinoma: case report and review
Xiaoying Qi1,2, Houqing Pang1,2, Ling Wang1,2
1Department of Ultrasound, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Background:
Renal fornices rupture with urinoma formation in fetuses is an unusual condition that acts as a 'pop off' mechanism to buffer renal pelvis pressure. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is the most common cause of prenatal hydronephrosis, but it rarely leads to the formation of urinoma. Fetal urinoma could be indicative of poor renal function after birth. We report a rare case of UPJO-related urinoma accompanied with urinary ascites, which ruptured during vaginal delivery.
Case Presentation:
A 30-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital at 25+3 weeks gestation for fetal bilateral hydronephrosis. This probable case of UPJO became further complicated at 29+5 weeks with the presence of a urinoma around the left kidney and ascites. Afterwards, the urinoma gradually enlarged and the ascites worsened, accompanied by testicular hydrocele, pleural effusion, and polyhydramnios. The last prenatal ultrasound at 36+1 weeks disclosed that the size of the urinoma was approximately 9.0 × 6.3x8.7 cm. The amniotic membrane ruptured prematurely and a male infant was vaginally delivered at 37 weeks. The baby developed gradually worsening abdominal distension. Bedside US revealed the urinoma became irregular and smaller, accompanied by a significant increase in ascites. It was speculated that the urinoma might experience a secondary rupture. Ascites drainage was performed and the urinoma disappeared. But it reemerged 2 days later with a significant increase in serum creatinine. The parents opted to abandon treatment. Surprisingly, the infant developed good feeding and mental health after discharge. Serum creatinine returned to normal at 3 months. Due to compression of surrounding tissues by the huge urinoma, the infant accepted urinoma resection surgery at 6 months. By the age of one, the infant was developing normally without signs of renal impairment.
Conclusions:
Prenatal identification of a large urinoma with urinary ascites requires necessary attention and appropriate management strategies. Prenatal urinoma drainage is indicated for large urinoma risking dystocia or rupture during delivery. Postnatal ascites requires active drainage to prevent creatinine and urea reabsorption and other complications. Small asymptomatic urinoma can be managed conservatively, but early surgery is recommended for large or recurrent urinoma exerting pressure on surrounding tissues.
More Related Videos
06:39Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Published on: November 22, 2019
03:19Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography
Published on: June 21, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Calculi II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management