Comparison of first and third generation EGFR-TKIs for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A

Maitri Shah1, Kashvi Shah1, Hetvi Dave1

  • 1Pharm.D section, L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, India.

Insights

Osimertinib did not show superiority over gefitinib/erlotinib for EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in India. While safer, its higher cost was not justified by clinical effectiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pharmacology
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Lung cancer is a major global cause of death.
  • Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is prevalent in India.
  • First- and second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) like gefitinib/erlotinib and third-generation TKIs like osimertinib are used for treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of osimertinib against gefitinib/erlotinib in Indian patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC.
  • To evaluate objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AE).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective observational cohort study in Western India.
  • Inclusion of patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC.
  • Assessment of treatment response using ORR, DCR, PFS, and AE incidence.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in ORR (11.11% vs 25.64%) or DCR (69.44% vs 82.05%) between osimertinib and gefitinib/erlotinib.
  • Median PFS was 8.43 months for osimertinib and 10.68 months for gefitinib/erlotinib.
  • Osimertinib showed a lower incidence of adverse events (1.94 vs 2.49).

Conclusions:

  • Osimertinib was not clinically superior to gefitinib/erlotinib in this patient cohort.
  • Osimertinib demonstrated a better safety profile.
  • The higher cost of osimertinib was not justified by its clinical effectiveness compared to gefitinib/erlotinib.