Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Ranks01:02

Ranks

220
Unlike parametric methods, nonparametric statistics are ideal for nominal and ordinal data, requiring fewer assumptions about the population's nature or distribution. This makes nonparametric methods easier to apply and interpret, as they do not depend on parameters like mean or standard deviation. One common approach in nonparametric analysis is to sort data according to a specific criterion. For instance, we might arrange weather data from hottest to coldest days in a month or rank cities...
220
Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

6.9K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
6.9K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

134
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
134
SI Units: 2019 Redefinition01:13

SI Units: 2019 Redefinition

1.4K
Measurement is an indispensable part of analytical chemistry. The result of measurement helps quantify a substance's physical property and compare it with the physical property of another substance. Each measurement comprises two components - a number indicating the magnitude and a unit of measurement as a standard for comparison. Further, the same quantity can be measured using different units of measurement, which leads to differences in magnitude.
A standard set of units has been defined...
1.4K
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test01:21

Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test

139
The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, also known as the Mann-Whitney U test, is a nonparametric test used to determine if there is a significant difference between the distributions of two independent samples. This test is designed specifically for two independent populations and has the following key requirements:
139

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Computational analysis on design and optimization of low-frequency dielectrophoretic microfluidic lab on a chip for <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> isolation from blood.

BioImpacts : BI·2026
Same journal

Levosimendan in burn wound ischemia: Mechanistic rationale and therapeutic potential.

BioImpacts : BI·2026
Same journal

Targeted delivery of doxorubicin using RSV F-protein modified breast cancer-derived exosomes in breast cancer-bearing mice.

BioImpacts : BI·2026
Same journal

Designing a novel therapeutic candidate vaccine for HPV16 using immunoinformatics approach: Targeting E6 and E7 epitopes with TLR4 agonist integration.

BioImpacts : BI·2026
Same journal

Dutasteride-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier for androgenic alopecia treatment - An <i>in vivo</i> study.

BioImpacts : BI·2026
Same journal

Classification of recurrent implantation failure patients using peripheral blood immunological and metabolic markers.

BioImpacts : BI·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

31.1K

University rankings: Time to reconsider.

Khaled Moustafa1

  • 1The Arabic Preprint Server (ArabiXiv)‎.

Bioimpacts : BI
|February 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary

University rankings can be detrimental, prioritizing biased metrics over true educational value. An internal assessment focusing on community satisfaction and educational quality offers a more effective and ethical approach to evaluating higher education institutions.

Keywords:
Academic excellenceJournal impact factorMedical school rankingSchool rankingShanghai rankingTop universitiesUniversity ranking

More Related Videos

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

18.9K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

31.1K
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

18.9K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.2K

Area of Science:

  • Higher Education Studies
  • Academic Assessment
  • Scholarly Communication

Background:

  • University rankings offer incentives for competition but introduce significant drawbacks.
  • Current ranking systems often rely on biased metrics like citations and journal impact factors, potentially misrepresenting scholarly work's true value.
  • Short-term gains and financially driven approaches can overshadow long-term educational goals and societal contributions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of current university ranking systems.
  • To highlight the limitations and potential harms associated with biased metrics and annual assessments.
  • To propose an alternative, more effective, and ethical approach to university evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of existing university ranking methodologies and their underlying metrics.
  • Critique of the reliance on quantitative, often biased, indicators such as citations and journal impact factors.
  • Conceptualization of an internal assessment model focused on qualitative factors and stakeholder satisfaction.

Main Results:

  • University rankings can incentivize unethical practices and prioritize superficial metrics over substantive educational and research quality.
  • Annual ranking criteria are impractical for capturing the long-term impact of research and education.
  • Biased, financially driven ranking systems pose a significant risk to the integrity of higher education.

Conclusions:

  • University ranking systems require reevaluation or abandonment to mitigate harm caused by biased and financially motivated approaches.
  • An internal assessment model, measuring community satisfaction and educational quality, offers a more effective and equitable method for evaluating universities.
  • Prioritizing student learning, knowledge advancement, and societal needs should be the core focus, rather than rankings based on flawed metrics.