Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pain and complications during ventrogluteal injection in standing versus lying positions in women: a quasi-experimental crossover study.

Journal of research in nursing : JRN·2026
Same author

Association of nursing error, just culture, and personality type: Health system promotion approach.

Journal of education and health promotion·2026
Same author

Early detection and community-based surveillance of Aedes albopictus in the Razmian region of Qazvin Province, Iran.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Integrating Equity in Topic Selection for Orphan Medicinal Products: Policy Implications for Health Technology Assessment in Rare Diseases.

Applied health economics and health policy·2026
Same author

Silicone Oil Migration into the Graft Interface after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in a Patient with a Past Surgical History of Silicone Oil Tamponade: A Case Report.

Case reports in ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in azoospermic men following chemotherapy: A cross-sectional study.

International journal of reproductive biomedicine·2026
Same journal

External validation of the European association of urology biochemical recurrence risk groups to predict mortality after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy in a North American cohort.

BJUI compass·2026
Same journal

When disease travels downstream: The effect of intravesical recurrences in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

BJUI compass·2026
Same journal

State of the nation: Understanding the current NHS treatment pathway to identify opportunities to advance future care of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer in the UK (SPAN-UK).

BJUI compass·2026
Same journal

Retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection for isolated nodal recurrence of renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: Contemporary outcomes of a case series.

BJUI compass·2026
Same journal

Early penile prosthesis infections in the contemporary antimicrobial era: Incidence and predictive factors from a regional cohort.

BJUI compass·2026
Same journal

[<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for baseline staging of high-risk prostate cancer: A real-world study.

BJUI compass·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2025

Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
06:28

Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia

Published on: May 27, 2022

3.7K

Differentiating between obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia: A machine learning-based approach.

Abdolreza Haghpanah1, Nazanin Ayareh2, Ashkan Akbarzadeh2

  • 1Department of Urology, School of Medicine Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz Iran.

BJUI Compass
|February 18, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Machine learning models can predict male infertility subtypes, obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), using clinical data. Logistic regression showed the highest accuracy in differentiating these azoospermia types.

Keywords:
azoospermiamachine learningmale infertilityobstructive

More Related Videos

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
09:16

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published on: June 18, 2020

6.8K
A Neural Network-Based Identification of Developmentally Competent or Incompetent Mouse Fully-Grown Oocytes
10:04

A Neural Network-Based Identification of Developmentally Competent or Incompetent Mouse Fully-Grown Oocytes

Published on: March 3, 2018

6.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
06:28

Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia

Published on: May 27, 2022

3.7K
Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis
09:16

Supervised Machine Learning for Semi-Quantification of Extracellular DNA in Glomerulonephritis

Published on: June 18, 2020

6.8K
A Neural Network-Based Identification of Developmentally Competent or Incompetent Mouse Fully-Grown Oocytes
10:04

A Neural Network-Based Identification of Developmentally Competent or Incompetent Mouse Fully-Grown Oocytes

Published on: March 3, 2018

6.6K

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Andrology
  • Medical Informatics

Background:

  • Infertility is a significant global health issue, with azoospermia representing its most severe form in males.
  • Accurate differentiation between obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is critical for guiding appropriate treatment strategies.
  • This study addresses the need for improved diagnostic tools in male infertility management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting azoospermia subtypes (OA vs. NOA).
  • To utilize clinical, ultrasonographic, semen, and hormonal analysis data for subtype prediction.
  • To compare the performance of logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest models.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 427 azoospermia patients was conducted.
  • Data included clinical factors, hormonal levels, semen parameters, and testicular features.
  • Three machine learning models were trained and evaluated for their ability to differentiate OA from NOA.

Main Results:

  • Significant differences were observed in body mass index, testicular dimensions, semen parameters, and hormonal levels between OA and NOA groups.
  • Logistic regression demonstrated the highest predictive performance, evidenced by superior F1-score and area under the curve values.
  • The study included 326 NOA and 101 OA cases, with a median patient age of 33 years.

Conclusions:

  • Machine learning holds promise for distinguishing azoospermia subtypes using accessible clinical information.
  • The developed models can aid in the diagnosis and management of male infertility.
  • Further validation and refinement are necessary for clinical implementation of these predictive models.