Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

An Orthotopic Bladder Cancer Model for Gene Delivery Studies
Published on: December 1, 2013
New Bladder Preservation Strategies in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder
Axel Heidenreich1, Dirk Böhmer, Christian Bolenz
1Department of Urology, UroOncology, Robot-assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany; Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Interdisciplinary Uro-Oncology, Berlin, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Background:
17 500 persons receive a new diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in Germany each year. Radical cystectomy is performed for muscle-invasive and for non-muscle-invasive, recurrent, high-risk tumors. Because this procedure carries a perioperative complication rate of 30-40% and impairs the patients' quality of life, options have been developed for intravesical and systemic bladder-preserving treatment.
Methods:
This review is based on pertinent publications (up to July 2024) on bladder-preserving treatment methods that were retrieved by a selective search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.
Results:
Multiple clinical phase II-III trials and observational studies are available. Carefully selected patients with recurrent, non-muscle-invasive, high-risk urothelial carcinoma received bladder-preserving treatment of the following kinds: intravesical chemotherapy with or without hyperthermia (52-65% progressionfree at 2-3 years); drug-coated carrier systems (complete remission, 50-83%); viral gene therapy (complete remission, 53%); systemic immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (19-44% recurrence-free at 1 year). The rate of bladder preservation was 49-100%. No worsening of overall survival was observed. Treatments for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma included neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by frequent follow-up, radical transurethral tumor resection, partial cystectomy, and trimodal radiochemotherapy (TMRT). Only TMRT yielded comparable long-term oncological results to those of cystectomy, with a 74% rate of freedom from metastases and an overall survival rate of 73%. Any type of bladder-preserving treatment requires meticulous long-term urooncological follow-up, with repeated cystoscopies, bladder biopsies, urine cytologies, and multiparametric bladder MRI.
Conclusion:
Bladder-preserving treatments should be considered part of the therapeutic armamentarium and should be critically discussed in an interdisciplinary setting.
More Related Videos
11:02Induction of Invasive Transitional Cell Bladder Carcinoma in Immune Intact Human MUC1 Transgenic Mice: A Model for Immunotherapy Development
Published on: October 30, 2013
06:39Technical Modification of the Terminal Ureter During Total Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
Published on: November 22, 2019