Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025
Busulfan as a Myelosuppressive Agent for Generating Stable High-level Bone Marrow Chimerism in Mice
Published on: April 1, 2015
Examining Different Methods to Assess Busulfan Exposure in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients
Maxwell Thompson1, Christine E Staatz1, Christopher J Fraser2
1School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Background:
Noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and model-based method (MBM) can be used to estimate the cumulative area under the concentration-time curve (AUC cum ) during therapeutic drug monitoring. Understanding predictive differences among these techniques should assist in switching between them and interpreting their results. The aim of this study was to compare busulfan AUC cum prediction based on NCA technique (Kinetica) and MBM (NextDose) applied to the same concentration-time data from pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.
Methods:
Data on busulfan therapy administered once daily through intermittent infusion were obtained from 4 hospitals in Australia and New Zealand. Busulfan concentrations were measured at 3, 3.25, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours after infusion initiation over 4 treatment days. Information on busulfan dose, pharmacokinetic profile, and patient covariate factors (if required) were supplied sequentially to Kinetica and NextDose to generate NCA-based and MBM-based predictions of busulfan exposure; differences in AUC cum estimates at the end of the treatment course were compared using Bland-Altman plots, box plots, and Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test.
Results:
Data from 90 HSCT recipients (2131 busulfan samples) were included. The median patient age and weight were 4.3 years and 17.0 kg, respectively. Median AUC cum estimated based on NCA and MBM were 78.0 mg.h/L [range: 51.7-107.0] and 85.5 mg.h/L [range: 60.6-120.8], respectively, with statistically significant difference in AUC cum values ( P < 0.001). The mean percentage difference in AUC cum values between the 2 different methods suggested that if the AUC cum target using MBMs (NextDose) is 78-101 mg.h/L, then an equivalent target using NCA (Kinetica) would be reduced by 9.1%.
Conclusions:
When switching between NCA and MBMs to estimate busulfan AUC cum in pediatric HSCT recipients, a change in the target AUC cum is likely required to maintain a similar drug exposure during therapeutic drug monitoring.
