Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 1, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Factors influencing trust in algorithmic decision-making: an indirect scenario-based experiment
Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos1, Rebecca Marrone2, Malgorzata Korolkiewicz2
1College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Statistical literacy impacts trust in algorithms differently for low-stakes versus high-stakes decisions. Explainability did not affect trust, suggesting a need for broader AI literacy education.
Area of Science:
- Decision Science
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Background:
- Public distrust in algorithms is prevalent, despite their widespread use in decision-making.
- Educational interventions, such as explaining algorithmic processes, are hypothesized to reduce this distrust.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between statistical literacy, algorithm explainability, and trust in algorithms.
- To examine how these factors differ across low-stakes and high-stakes decision contexts.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 1,921 participants across 20 countries.
- Analysis of trust in algorithms concerning both low-stakes and high-stakes decisions.
- Assessment of the influence of statistical literacy and algorithm explainability on trust levels.
Main Results:
- Statistical literacy showed a negative association with trust in high-stakes algorithmic decisions.
- Statistical literacy positively correlated with trust in low-stakes scenarios with familiar algorithms.
- Algorithm explainability did not significantly influence participants' trust in algorithms.
Conclusions:
- Statistical literacy empowers individuals to critically assess algorithmic outputs, especially for significant decisions.
- Promoting statistical and artificial intelligence (AI) literacy is crucial for navigating complexities of algorithmic trust.
- Future research should explore user interactions and physiological measures for more accurate trust assessment.
More Related Videos
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Hindsight Biases
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...