Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010 to 2018
Eduardo J Santiago-Rodriguez1,2, Salma Shariff-Marco1,3,4, Zinzi D Bailey5
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Background:
Residential segregation limits the access to resources, primarily because of disinvestment. This study evaluated the association between residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States and whether findings differed by race and ethnicity.
Methods:
Restricted National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were used to ascertain colorectal cancer screening adherence per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Residential segregation was operationalized using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), based on income, race, and ethnicity information obtained from the 2014 to 2018 American Community Survey estimates for counties. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust variance estimators accounting for within-county correlation were used. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity and weighted to represent the US population.
Results:
In this cross-sectional study (n = 44,690), participants residing in less advantaged counties had lower colorectal cancer screening adherence than those residing in the most advantaged counties [Q1 vs. Q5, OR (95% confidence interval): ICE income, 0.77 (0.70-0.86); ICE race, 0.86 (0.77-0.96); ICE race + income, 0.75 (0.67-0.84)]. In analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, we observed that overall findings were mostly driven by White people and estimates were less precise with no clear gradients among racial and ethnic minoritized groups. Among Black participants, colorectal cancer screening did not vary across quintiles of economic segregation.
Conclusions:
Residential segregation was associated with colorectal cancer screening.
Impact:
Interventions aimed at improving colorectal cancer screening uptake in the United States should address structural barriers present in areas with higher concentrations of low-income minoritized racial and ethnic groups and how features of residential segregation might differentially affect racial and ethnic groups.
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

