Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Progression-free survival as a potential surrogate end point for overall survival in advanced cervical carcinoma
Ramon Yarza1, Melpomeni Kountouri2, Helena Guedes3
1Drug Development and Phase I Unit, START-CIOCC, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
Objective:
This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to study the potential of progression-free survival as a surrogate end point for trials evaluating the use of systemic therapy in advanced cervical cancer.
Methods:
We performed a systematic review selecting phase II and III randomized trials including locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic cervical cancer, with mature progression-free survival and overall survival data. Our study adhered to the Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist and was registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023405604). Exclusions comprised trials involving adjuvant treatment as the primary end point. The magnitude of progression-free survival and overall survival was assessed using standardized z-scores. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment type, line of treatment, and prior radiotherapy exposure. Surrogacy was evaluated according to the recommendations by the Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen.
Results:
A total of 20 studies were included in the final analysis. In the overall population, a moderate correlation between progression-free survival and overall survival was observed (r = 0.75, p < .001). The surrogate threshold effect (STE) indicated a threshold for progression-free survival z-score (z-progression-free survival of 2.53), intersecting with null overall survival outcome (z = 1.96). Subgroup analysis revealed a weak and nonsignificant correlation in chemotherapy trials (r = 0.5, p = .12) with a higher STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.83). Conversely, chemoimmunotherapy combinations exhibited a robust and statistically significant correlation (r = 0.99, p = 0.01) with a lower STE (z-progression-free survival = 2.39). Trials exploring advanced therapy lines demonstrated a higher and more significant correlation (r = 0.98, p = .02) with a lower STE at 2.08, whereas upfront-line therapy trials showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.67, p = 0.01) with an STE magnitude of 2.58.
Conclusion:
Progression-free survival exhibits a moderate correlation with a modest STE. For chemoimmunotherapy combinations, there is a strong correlation between overall survival and progression-free survival, with a notably lower STE. This suggests that the relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival may vary significantly based on the treatment strategy.
More Related Videos
08:12Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Published on: March 14, 2019
04:04Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...