Early versus delayed inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Henrique Provinciatto1, Marcus Vinicius Barbosa Moreira2, Lucas Rezende de Freitas3

  • 1Department of Medicine, Barão de Mauá University Center, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.

Insights

For preterm infants, delaying inguinal hernia repair until after hospitalization may reduce recurrence risks. Early repair did not increase incarceration but showed a higher recurrence rate in this meta-analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Neonatal Care
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Inguinal hernias are common in preterm infants.
  • Optimal timing for surgical repair remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze the optimal timing for inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants.
  • Evaluate risks associated with early versus delayed surgical intervention.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing early and delayed inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants.
  • Searched Cochrane Central, Embase, and PubMed databases.
  • Calculated risk ratios using random effects models.

Main Results:

  • Included 1207 patients from eight studies; 56% underwent early repair.
  • No significant association found between early repair and incarceration (RR 1.14, p=0.52).
  • Early repair was associated with an increased risk of recurrence (RR 3.11, p=0.02).

Conclusions:

  • Postponing inguinal hernia repair in preterm infants until after hospitalization is suggested.
  • Delaying repair may mitigate increased risks of recurrence and respiratory complications associated with early intervention.

Related Concept Videos