Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Analyses of Actin Dynamics, Clutch Coupling and Traction Force for Growth Cone Advance
Published on: October 21, 2021
Inferring active and passive mechanical drivers of epithelial convergent extension
Sommer Anjum1,2, Deepthi Vijayraghavan1, Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalez3,4,5,6
1Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Abstract:
What can we learn about the mechanical processes that shape tissues by simply watching? Several schemes suggest that static cell morphology or junctional connectivity can reveal where chains of cells transmit force or where force asymmetries drive cellular rearrangements. We hypothesize that dynamic cell shape changes from time lapse sequences can be used to distinguish specific mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis. Convergent extension (CE) is a crucial developmental motif wherein a planar tissue narrows in one direction and lengthens in the other. It is tempting to assume that forces driving CE reside within cells of the deforming tissue, as CE may reflect a variety of active processes or passive responses to forces generated by adjacent tissues. In this work, we first construct a simple model of epithelial cells capable of passive CE in response to external forces. We adapt this framework to simulate CE from active anisotropic processes in three different modes: crawling, contraction, and capture. We develop an image analysis pipeline for analysis of morphogenetic changes in both live cells and simulated cells using a panel of mechanical and statistical approaches. Our results allow us to identify how each simulated mechanism uniquely contributes to tissue morphology and provide insight into how force transmission is coordinated. We construct a MEchanism Index (MEI) to quantify how similar live cells are to simulated passive and active cells undergoing CE. Applying these analyses to live cell data of Xenopus neural CE reveals features of both passive motion and active forces. Furthermore, we find spatial variation across the neural plate. We compare the inferred mechanisms in the frog midline to tissues undergoing CE in both the mouse and fly. We find that distinct active modes may have different prevalences depending on the model system. Our modeling framework allows us to gain insight from tissue timelapse images and assess the relative contribution of specific cellular mechanisms to observed tissue phenotypes. This approach can be used to guide further experimental inquiry into how mechanics influences the shaping of tissues and organs during development.
More Related Videos
07:55Analyzing Cell Surface Adhesion Remodeling in Response to Mechanical Tension Using Magnetic Beads
Published on: March 8, 2017
12:35Author Spotlight: Optogenetic Inhibition of Rho1-Mediated Actomyosin Contractility Coupled with Measurement of Epithelial Tension in Drosophila Embryos
Published on: April 14, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Tension Response at Adherens Junctions
α-Catenin as a Mechanosensory Protein
The α-catenin of adherens junctions is an allosteric protein with three VH (vinculin...
Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces
Anchoring junctions mechanically attach a cell to the...
Cell Migration
Mechanism of Ciliary Motion
The cilia are made up of microtubules in a 9+2 arrangement, with nine microtubule doublet ring bundles, surrounding a pair of central singlet microtubule bundles. The doublet microtubule bundles are...
Cell Motility through Blebbing
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...
Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation