Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Cloud-Based Phrase Mining and Analysis of User-Defined Phrase-Category Association in Biomedical Publications
Published on: February 23, 2019
What's beyond the core? Database coverage in qualitative information retrieval.
Jennifer Horton1, David Kaunelis2, Danielle Rabb3
1jhorton@cap.org, Medical Librarian, College of American Pathologists, Northfield, Illinois, United States.
Multidisciplinary databases like Scopus and Web of Science offer superior retrieval of qualitative studies for health technology assessment reviews compared to specialized health databases. Their extensive unique records enhance systematic and rapid review search strategies.
Area of Science:
- Health Technology Assessment
- Information Science
- Qualitative Research Methodology
Background:
- Qualitative research is increasingly vital in systematic and rapid reviews within Health Technology Assessment (HTA).
- Standardized search methodologies for retrieving qualitative studies, especially database selection, are still evolving.
- Effective database searching is crucial for comprehensive literature retrieval in HTA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of commonly used bibliographic databases in retrieving qualitative studies for HTA.
- To compare the performance of specialized health databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) with multidisciplinary citation indexes (Scopus, Web of Science).
- To identify optimal database strategies for qualitative research retrieval in HTA.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive list of relevant journal titles was compiled using InCites Journal Citation Reports.
- This list was validated by qualitative researchers at Canada's Drug Agency.
- The qualitative holdings of MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science were evaluated by calculating percentages of total and unique titles held.
Main Results:
- Multidisciplinary databases, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, held the highest percentages of total qualitative study titles.
- Scopus and Web of Science also provided a greater number of unique qualitative study titles compared to specialized health databases.
- Contrary to general recommendations, these multidisciplinary indexes demonstrated superior coverage of relevant qualitative literature.
Conclusions:
- Multidisciplinary citation indexes like Scopus and Web of Science possess significant utility for qualitative search strategies in HTA.
- These databases can supplement traditional searches by providing unique qualitative records.
- Further investigation into utilizing Scopus for qualitative rapid review search strategies confirmed its potential to contribute relevant literature.
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Data Collection by Survey
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Data Collection III
The principles to begin the physical assessment include conducting a comprehensive or problem-related history in a quiet, well-lit room, emphasizing privacy and comfort for the...
Bar Graph
Data Collection I

