Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing Early Detection and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Tumors
Published on: February 16, 2024
Insights into the Clinical Prognosis of High-grade Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasms
Peggy Dartigues1, Vahan Kepenekian2,3, Claire Illac-Vauquelin4
1Department of Pathology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif.
Abstract:
High-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (HAMN) is used to describe a rare epithelial neoplasm of the appendix characterized by pushing-type invasion and high-grade cytologic atypia. Its implications regarding lymph node spread and the necessity of right colectomy are currently debate. The objective of the present study was to assess the clinicopathologic characteristics, the risk of lymph node and peritoneal metastasis, and long-term outcomes of patients diagnosed as HAMN in comparison to low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm (LAMN) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma, treated by right hemicolectomy. A total of 443 patients diagnosed with LAMN (n=246), HAMN (n=34), or appendiceal adenocarcinoma (n=163) and who underwent right colectomy with lymph node dissection in all cases within 32 institutions of the French Network for Rare Peritoneal Malignancies (RENAPE) were included. The median age was 56.5 years (range: 21 to 91), and the majority were female (n=250, 56.4%) without difference between groups ( P =0.604). Lymph node metastases were identified in 17.8% of appendiceal adenocarcinoma cases (29/163); none were found among LAMN or HAMN cases. A higher number of lymph nodes were analyzed in those treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoma than LAMN ( P <0.001) and HAMN ( P =0.035). Regarding peritoneal metastasis, a higher proportion of cases were classified as high-grade with/without signet cells in patients treated for HAMN ( P <0.001) and appendiceal adenocarcinoma ( P <0.001) than those treated for LAMN. Among patients with perforation of the appendix, those treated for LAMN had longer overall survival (OS; P <0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P <0.0001) than those treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoma or those treated for HAMN; among patients without perforation, those treated for LAMN and HAMN had longer OS ( P =0.042) and PFS ( P =0.012) than those treated for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. No lymph node metastases were observed in patients treated for HAMN, and those without appendix perforation had a similar prognosis to LAMN. This study supports staging HAMN using the same system as LAMN and treating it with appendectomy alone in the absence of appendix perforation.
More Related Videos
00:08Murine Appendectomy Model of Chronic Colitis Associated Colorectal Cancer by Precise Localization of Caecal Patch
Published on: August 24, 2019
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...