Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 10, 2026
Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Are Patients Still Better off Than if Primary Arthroplasty Had Not Been Performed?
Justin Leal1, Marcus DiLallo1, Thorsten M Seyler1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Background:
This study sought to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) before primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and after successful treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), with the hypothesis that patients still demonstrate clinical improvement despite the occurrence of PJI.
Methods:
A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent primary TJA, developed PJI, and were managed for PJI from January 2019 to December 2023. Patients who did not have PROMs recorded were excluded from the study. Preoperative and postoperative generic and joint-specific PROMs were collected. Patient preprimary and postfinal revision surgery for PJI PROMs were subsequently compared. The minimum follow-up after PJI treatment was 6 months. A total of 55 patients (31 total knee arthroplasty and 24 total hip arthroplasty) were included with a mean follow-up of 1.8 years (range, 6 months to 4.5 years). All PJIs were managed via debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention, 1-stage, 1.5-stage, 2-stage revision, or resection arthroplasty.
Results:
After final revision surgery for PJI in total knee arthroplasty, patients had lower median patient-reported outcome measure information system (PROMIS) pain interference scores than before their primary surgery (62.0 [55.0, 67.0] versus 67.0 [65.0, 70.5]; P < 0.01). However, median PROMIS physical function postfinal revision for PJI and preprimary scores were similar (38.0 [33.0, 42.0] versus 34.0 [29.5, 40.0]; P = 0.08). After final revision surgery for PJI in total hip arthroplasty, patients had lower median PROMIS pain interference scores than before their primary surgery (57.5 [53.8, 64.0] versus 68.0 [66.5, 74.0]; P < 0.01). After final revision surgery for PJI, patients also had higher median PROMIS physical function scores than before their primary surgery (39.5 [33.5, 48.2] versus 29.5 [28.8, 34.2]; P < 0.01).
Conclusions:
Patients who have been successfully managed for PJI show improvement in generic and joint-specific PROMs compared to their preprimary TJA PROMs.
