Abdominal wall complications: An unknown aspect of morbidity in phalloplasty. A comprehensive analysis and clinical
K Allepot1, N Morel-Journel2, F Boucher3
1Department of Plastic Surgery, Ambroise-Paré, 9, avenue Charles-de-Gaulle, 92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Background:
Phalloplasty is a complex reconstructive procedure with complications broadly categorized as urinary, vascular, or donor-site related. This study investigates abdominal wall complications, such as bulging and lateral hernias, associated with the use of the inferior epigastric artery as the recipient vessel in microsurgical phalloplasty-a rare and underreported complication.
Methods:
A retrospective review was conducted on 37 patients who underwent microsurgical phalloplasty at a university hospital from January 2016 to February 2020. The most commonly employed technique was forearm flap phalloplasty, followed by the MSLD flap technique. The inferior epigastric artery was accessed via a 7cm oblique incision. Data collected included demographic details, BMI, smoking status, surgical technique, recipient vessel used, and postoperative complications. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 15 days, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively.
Results:
Of the 37 patients, the mean age was 33 years, with 84% undergoing phalloplasty for gender affirmation. Abdominal wall complications occurred in 11% of patients (n=4). Three patients developed parietal complications (hernia or bulging), all requiring surgical revision. All three were smokers, one had a BMI>28, and none had prior abdominal surgeries. Contributing factors included musculoaponeurotic disruption, relative denervation from vessel exposure, and smoking-related wound healing impairment.
Conclusions:
The use of the inferior epigastric artery in microsurgical phalloplasty may increase the risk of abdominal wall complications, particularly in smokers and patients with elevated BMI. Optimizing preoperative risk factors, including smoking cessation and careful vessel selection, is essential for reducing these complications. To reduce the occurrence of these complications, the choice of the recipient vessel should be considered alongside the surgical technique during operative planning. Further studies should explore technical refinements to minimize abdominal wall morbidity.
