Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025

14:14
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
5.8K
Palaeognath birds innovate to solve a novel foraging problem
Fay E Clark1, Jasmine Burdass2, Annalise Kavanagh2
1School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TU, UK. fay.clark@bristol.ac.uk.
Scientific Reports
|February 20, 2025
Summary
Palaeognath birds, like emus and rheas, demonstrate technical innovation by moving a hole to access food. This suggests complex cognitive abilities evolved earlier in avian evolution than previously understood.
Area of Science:
- Avian cognition
- Comparative psychology
- Evolutionary biology
Background:
- Innovation is a key metric of intelligence, extensively studied in Neognathae birds.
- Palaeognathae birds, a more ancestral clade, have been largely overlooked in innovation research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate technical innovation in palaeognath birds for the first time.
- To assess the cognitive flexibility of palaeognaths using a novel problem-solving task.
Main Methods:
- Nine individuals from three palaeognath species (emus, rheas, ostriches) were tested on a task requiring them to move a hole towards a food reward.
- The task differed from traditional puzzle-boxes by requiring movement of the aperture, not removal of an obstacle.
Main Results:
- Three emus and one rhea exhibited wheel-turning innovation, efficiently moving the hole closer to food in 90% of trials.
- One rhea displayed a second innovation by dismantling the task (removing a bolt), though this behavior ceased upon adopting the wheel-turning solution.
- Ostriches did not demonstrate innovation.
Conclusions:
- Palaeognath innovation appears to be low-level, driven by exploration and trial-and-error learning.
- Technical innovation may have evolved much earlier in birds than previously hypothesized.
- Palaeognath birds represent a promising group for future cognitive research.
Related Concept Videos
Optimal Foraging
11.9K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
11.9K
Limits to Natural Selection
31.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.0K
Predator-Prey Interactions
16.1K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
16.1K
Convergent Evolution
27.3K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
27.3K
Types of Selection
40.0K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.0K
Conservation of Declining Populations
9.6K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
9.6K

