Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2025
Echocardiographic Evaluation of Atrial Communications before Transcatheter Closure
Published on: February 8, 2022
Optimizing Device Selection in Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Comparative Study of Different Transthoracic
Meltem Tekin1, Gamze Babur Güler1, Mehmet Çiçek1
1TC Saglik Bakanligi Mehmet Akif Ersoy Gogus Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey.
Background:
Clinically significant paravalvular leak (PVL) may complicate both surgical and transcatheter valve implantation. Percutaneous PVL closure (PPVLC) is becoming an increasingly attractive alternative to redo surgery, with demonstrated lower mortality and morbidity rates. Echocardiographic techniques are crucial for accurate diagnosis, defect sizing, and determining the appropriate size of the sealing devices.
Aims:
There is no consensus on the optimal imaging modality for PVLs. We aimed to compare transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic measurements to accurately determine defect size and estimate device size.
Methods:
We reviewed hospital records to identify patients diagnosed with moderate to severe and severe PVL from 2018 to 2024. A total of 81 patients who underwent PPVLC were evaluated. Eight of these patients were excluded due to unsuccessful PPVLC, leaving 73 patients who were successfully treated. The defect size for all patients was evaluated using 2D transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 2D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), direct 3D TEE cropped volume rendering vena contracta (VC) measurement, and 3D TEE multiplanar reconstruction (3D TEE MPR).
Results:
Among the 73 patients, 42 underwent aortic PPVLC and 31 underwent mitral PPVLC. Proportional odds logistic regression analysis identified 3D TEE MPR measurement as the strongest predictor of device size accuracy, both overall and within the aortic/mitral subgroups. In the mitral subgroup, the predictive power of direct 3D TEE cropped volume rendering VC measurement and 3D TEE MPR measurement were similar. Furthermore, a cut-off value of 7 mm was identified for hemodynamically significant jets as measured by 3D methods.
Conclusion:
Our findings suggest that using 3D TEE MPR significantly improves the accuracy of device size selection in both mitral and aortic PVL. Additionally, direct 3D TEE cropped volume rendering VC measurement can serve as a viable alternative for patients with mitral PVL.
