Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.8K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.8K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

169
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
169
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.1K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.1K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.8K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.8K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

3.4K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.4K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Add-on benefits of botulinum toxin type A in combination or sequential therapies for scar management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Synergistic effects of crop straw formulations on <i>Stropharia rugosoannulata</i> cultivation and soil microecology in continuous cropping systems.

Microbiology spectrum·2026
Same author

Stress granules restrain ferroptosis by sequestering ferritin.

Nature cell biology·2026
Same author

Ultrasound imaging features of cervical lymph nodes with melanoma metastasis compared with benign cervical nodes.

Melanoma research·2026
Same author

Deficiency and Excess of Folic Acid Intake Promote Colorectal Carcinogenesis in AOM/DSS-Treated Mice: Roles in Uracil Misincorporation and DNA Methylation.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

HSR26-231: Diagnostic Performance of the Bexaâ„¢ Breast Exam for Detection of Breast Masses: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same journal

From silenced shock to strategic resilience: a longitudinal qualitative study of nurse residents' trajectory in coping with patient verbal abuse.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) for forest firefighters: implications for human-technology interaction and occupational safety in the future of work.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of the football emotion scale for Chinese youth players: a psychometric study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

From online engagement to offline action: how social media environmental engagement shapes university students' pro-environmental citizenship through intrinsic motivation and personal norms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The multidimensional inventory of religious/spiritual wellbeing in Hungarian language: psychometric properties and initial validation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Effects of occupational factors on depression in Chinese veterans: a fsQCA study based on 2022 CFPS data.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 27, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K

A multidimensional Bayesian IRT method for discovering misconceptions from concept test data.

Martin Segado1, Aaron Adair2, John Stewart3

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Frontiers in Psychology
|February 21, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new method to automatically identify student misconceptions from multiple-choice tests. The approach successfully uncovered known and potentially new learning difficulties in physics, aiding targeted instruction.

Keywords:
distractor analysishierarchical priorsitem response theorymean-field variational inferencemultidimensional nominal categories modelmultiple-choice questionsstudent misconceptions

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.8K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 27, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

10.8K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Cognitive Science
  • Physics Education Research

Background:

  • Identifying student misconceptions is crucial for effective teaching.
  • Traditional methods often require manual analysis of test data.
  • Existing psychometric models may not fully capture the nuances of student thinking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate an exploratory method for discovering student misconceptions from multiple-choice concept tests.
  • To leverage a Bayesian implementation of the Multidimensional Nominal Categories Item Response Theory model (MNCM) for automated misconception identification.
  • To demonstrate the method's ability to identify misconceptions without manual content labeling.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian MNCM combined with factor-analytic rotation methods.
  • Analyzed student responses at the individual distractor level.
  • Validated the method on synthetic data and compared it to existing IRT software.

Main Results:

  • The Bayesian MNCM accurately recovered multidimensional item parameters from synthetic data.
  • The method showed robustness to overfitting and performed automatic dimensionality assessment.
  • Applied to the Force Concept Inventory, the method identified 13 additional dimensions beyond overall score, consistent with known Newtonian mechanics misconceptions.

Conclusions:

  • The developed method effectively discovers likely student misconceptions from concept test data.
  • This approach can refine existing concept inventories or aid in developing new ones.
  • Findings support the potential for discovering new misconceptions and enabling targeted instruction.