Which technical difficulty score can best predict postoperative outcomes after minimally invasive liver resections?
- Louisa Bolm 1,2, Martina Nebbia 1,3, Onofrio Catalano 4, Gabriella Lionetto 1,5, Johanna von Bresinsky 2, Jannis Duhn 2, Shahrzad Arya 1, Marco Ventin 1, Julia Straesser 1,2, Cristina R Ferrone 6,7
- Louisa Bolm 1,2, Martina Nebbia 1,3, Onofrio Catalano 4
- 1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- 2Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany.
- 3Department of Surgery, Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
- 4Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- 5Department of Surgery, Unit of pancreatic Surgery, Verona University, Verona, Italy.
- 6Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Cristina.Ferrone@cshs.org.
- 7Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, North Tower STE, Los Angeles, 8215, CA, USA. Cristina.Ferrone@cshs.org.
- 0Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Technical difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) were assessed. High-difficulty LLRs showed low morbidity and mortality, with IWATE criteria best predicting outcomes.
Area Of Science
- Hepatobiliary Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background
- Assessing technical difficulty in laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) is crucial for patient safety and outcome prediction.
- Existing scoring systems require validation in large, well-characterized patient cohorts.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the accuracy of various technical difficulty scores for LLR.
- To determine the performance of these scores in predicting postoperative outcomes.
Main Methods
- A retrospective analysis of 301 LLR patients and comparison with open liver resection (OLS) patients (2007-2022).
- Application and calibration of Ban, IWATE, Hasegawa, IMM, and Southhampton (SHH) scores.
- Assessment of score calibration against postoperative outcomes like morbidity, mortality, and operative time.
Main Results
- A significant proportion of LLRs were classified as high difficulty (18.9% to 52.2% by different scores).
- Low rates of intraoperative events and 90-day major morbidity (5.3%) and mortality (1.0%) were observed.
- IWATE criteria demonstrated the best calibration for predicting outcomes such as non-textbook outcomes, operative time, and morbidity.
Conclusions
- LLR is safe and effective, even for technically challenging cases, with low complication rates.
- The evaluated scoring systems accurately predict major liver surgery outcomes.
- IWATE criteria emerged as the most effective scoring system for assessing LLR difficulty and predicting outcomes.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

