Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
Outcome After Surgical Treatment for Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Systematic Review of Common Surgical
Ida-Marie Myron Wiinblad1,2, Johan Ulrichsen2, Birgitte Brandstrup1,2
1Department of Surgery, Holbæk Hospital, part of Copenhagen University Hospitals, Holbæk, Denmark.
Background:
The choice of operation for chronic pilonidal sinus disease remains controversial.
Objective:
To compare the outcomes of common operations for chronic pilonidal disease.
Data Sources:
We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.
Study Selection:
We included randomized trials in English or Danish language, published 2002 to 2024 that compared outcomes of operations to treat chronic pilonidal disease in adults and teenagers.
Interventions:
We compared the outcomes of secondary healing, primary midline closure, Bascom, Limberg, and Karydakis flap operations.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was recurrence; secondary outcomes were infection, healing time, and length of stay. We compared recurrence and infection rates in meta-analyses for all techniques. We assessed the risk of bias and the quality of all trials.
Results:
Fifty trials included a total of 5762 participants. In a meta-analysis, the flap operations had fewer recurrences than primary midline closure (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.19-0.51; p < 0.01). The trials comparing flap operations with secondary healing were heterogeneous and did not reach significance (OR 0.38; 95% CI, 0.13-1.13; p = 0.08). Recurrence was similar between Limberg and Karydakis operations. Infection rates were lower for the flap operations compared with primary closure (OR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23-0.48; p < 0.01) and with secondary healing (OR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.30-0.77; p < 0.01). Two trials tested Bascom procedure against Limberg operation without significant differences. All trials found secondary healing to have significantly longer healing times than any other operation.
Limitations:
Most studies had a high or medium risk of bias, resulting in very low to low certainty of evidence. The trials generally had small numbers, short follow-ups, and no reported primary outcomes or power calculations.
Conclusions:
Primary closure and secondary healing performed poorly compared with the flap techniques. Most trials tested Limberg operation; only 2 tested Bascom operation. The literature suggests the surgeon's expertise determines the choice of flap technique.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:

