Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples
Published on: June 9, 2016
Determination of output correction factors in magnetic fields using two methods for two detectors at the central axis
Stephan Frick1, Moritz Schneider2, Daniela Thorwarth2,3
1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany.
Abstract:
Objective.Commissioning an MR-linac treatment planning system requires output correction factors,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr, for detectors to accurately measure the linac's output at various field sizes. In this study,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrwas determined at the central axis using two methods: one that combines the corrections for the influence of the magnetic field and the small field in a single factor (kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr), and a second that isolates the magnetic field's influence, allowing the use of output correction factors without a magnetic field,kQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr, from literature for determiningkB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr.Approach.To determinekB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrand examine its behaviour across different photon energies and magnetic flux densitiesBin small fields, measurements with an ionization chamber (0.07 cm3sensitive volume) and a solid-state detector were carried out at an experimental facility for both approaches. Changes in absorbed dose to water with field size were determined via Monte Carlo simulations. To evaluate clinical applicability, additional measurements were conducted on a 1.5 T MR-linac.Main results.Both methods determined comparablekB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrresults. For field sizes >3 × 3 cm2,Branging from -1.5 to 1.5 T and photon energies of 6 and 8 MV, no change ofkQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsras a function of the magnetic field was observed. Comparison with measurement results from the 1.5 T MR-linac confirm this. For ⩽3 × 3 cm2,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrdepends on photon energy andB. For 1.5 T and 6 MV,BreduceskQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrup to 3% for the ionization chamber and up to 7% for the solid-state detector.Significance.kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsrwere successfully determined for two detectors, enabling their use at a 1.5 T MR-linac. For field sizes of >3 × 3 cm2,kB→,Qclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsris one for most detectors suitable for small field dosimetry for all available perpendicular MR-linac systems, as confirmed in the literature. For these field sizes and detectors, the correction factor accounting for the dosimeter response change in the reference field due to the magnetic field,kB→,Qmsrfmsr, can be used for cross-calibration. Therefore, future research may only focus on small field sizes.
More Related Videos
14:11Quantification of Hydrogen Concentrations in Surface and Interface Layers and Bulk Materials through Depth Profiling with Nuclear Reaction Analysis
Published on: March 29, 2016
09:43Optimized Setup and Protocol for Magnetic Domain Imaging with In Situ Hysteresis Measurement
Published on: November 7, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Field Due to Two Straight Wires
Torque On A Current Loop In A Magnetic Field
Consider a rectangular current-carrying loop containing N turns of wire, placed in a uniform magnetic field. The net force on a current-carrying loop...
Magnetic Field Of A Current Loop
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Mass Analyzers: Common Types
Mutual Inductance
When two circuits carrying time-varying currents are close to one another, the magnetic flux through each circuit varies because of the changing current in the other circuit. Consequently, an emf is induced in each circuit by the changing current in the other. Therefore, this type of emf is called...