Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

A Flame-Free Method for Sterilizing C. elegans Picks, Spatulas, and Scalpels
Published on: March 4, 2022
Bio-contaminated plastic micropipette tip sterilization stations: Environmentally, economically, and energetically
Arian Veyssi1, Laxmicharan Samineni2, Rashmi P Mohanty3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Abstract:
Bioscientific research laboratories significantly contribute to global plastic waste production through their use of plastic products, such as single-use micropipette tips. Biologically contaminated pipette tips must undergo several washing and sterilization steps before being reused or recycled. There is a dearth of available research studying the feasibility of pipette tip washing and sterilization in research laboratories. While automated tip-washing systems are available commercially for tip decontamination and reuse, the high initial purchasing cost of these washing stations and concerns related to washing efficiency deter many research laboratories from incorporating them. To mitigate these concerns, considering the University of Texas at Austin as an example, we performed a cost-benefit analysis of employing a university-wide pipette tip washing station. We estimated that only a single-time reuse of pipette tips could result in a 100% return on investment from the equipment. Additionally, preliminary analysis shows that pipette tip recycling can result in significant energy and water savings. With pilot experiments, we replicated UV-based decontamination steps employed by the commercial equipment and found the washing to be 100% efficient in sterilizing pipette tips contaminated with bacteriophage, DNA, and RNA. Decontaminated pipette tips were used to conduct phage quantification to demonstrate the feasibility of reuse for biological assays. Finally, we proposed an alternative autoclave-based sterilization method that can be used in individual research labs to decontaminate pipette tips. We found autoclave-based washing to be 100% efficient in sterilizing pipette tips contaminated with bacteriophage, whereas it is not efficient enough to decontaminate DNA and RNA.
More Related Videos
14:17The Portable Chemical Sterilizer PCS, D-FENS, and D-FEND ALL: Novel Chlorine Dioxide Decontamination Technologies for the Military
Published on: June 29, 2014
13:38Isolation of Native Soil Microorganisms with Potential for Breaking Down Biodegradable Plastic Mulch Films Used in Agriculture
Published on: May 10, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Sterilization I: Physical Methods
Steam sterilization uses non-toxic, low-cost moist heat in the form of saturated steam under pressure, which is fast, microbicidal, and sporicidal, and quickly warms and penetrates fabrics. Autoclaves, or steam sterilizers, expose each item to direct steam contact for a predetermined time at the necessary...
Methods of Sterilization II: Chemical Methods
Using chemical sterilization rather than heat to clean out equipment is recommended. It eradicates and removes all bacteria,...
Cleaning, Sterilization, and Disinfection
Cleaning
The cleaning process usually involves using water with detergents or enzymatic cleaner and removing foreign material from objects and surfaces, including organic material such as body fluids or inorganic material like soil. Cleaning is performed before high-level disinfection and sterilization because foreign materials on the cover of the devices interfere with process...