Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
Optimizing spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear MRI: comparison of different geometry-preserving
Johannes Gerb1,2, Valerie Kirsch3,4,5, Emilie Kierig3,5
1German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders (DSGZ), LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Johannes.Gerb@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract:
Spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear imaging data is challenging, due to both substantial intraindividual differences and the small size of the organ compared to other intracranial structures. Automatic whole brain co-registration to standard space can only roughly co-align the peripheral vestibular endorgan, and complemental manual registration is highly time-consuming. Here, we compared the accuracy of four geometry-maintaining co-registration methods (one semi-manual method and three automatic methods). High-resolution structural T2-MRI of 153 inner ears from patients and healthy participants were co-registered to an inner-ear atlas. The semi-manual method used a three-point landmark-based approach (3P), two automatic methods were based on unassisted standard algorithms (Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs), Elastix (EL)), while the fourth automatic method utilized a volumetrically dilated, atlas-based mask (thick inner ear, TIE) for probabilistic inner ear masking. Registration accuracy was evaluated by neurotologists blinded to the respective registration paradigm, and the resulting median volumes were quantified using colocalization analyses. The mask-aided automatic approach showed the best ratings, followed by the semi-manual three-point landmark-based registration (mean ratings (lower: better) TIE 2.21 ± 1.15; 3P 2.58 ± 0.61; EL 3.42 ± 1.06; ANTs 3.49 ± 1.26). The semi-manual method had the lowest rate of insufficient registrations, followed by TIE (3P: 3.70%; TIE: 8.28%; EL: 22.66%; ANTs: 27.02%). TIE showed the highest colocalization metrics with the atlas. Only TIE and 3P allowed for sufficient semicircular canal visualization in method-wise average volumes. Overall, geometry-preserving spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear imaging data is possible and could allow groupwise examinations of the bony labyrinth or temporal bone morphology in the future.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

