Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025
Individualized Stem-positioning in Calcar-guided Short-stem Total Hip Arthroplasty
Published on: February 27, 2018
Do all anatomic stems perform equally at long-term survival? A regional registry-based study on 12,010 total hip
Alberto Di Martino1,2, Valentino Rossomando3,4, Barbara Bordini5
1Department of Orthopedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli 1, Bologna, Italy. albertocorrado.dimartino@ior.it.
Background:
Anatomic stems for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been developed to achieve a precise geometric fit between the implant and the surrounding femoral bone, aiming at the improvement of primary stability of cementless implants until osteointegration occurs. The aim of the current study is to go over the regional Registry of Orthopaedic Prosthetic Implants (RIPO) to analyze survivorship of THA implants when anatomic stems are used; moreover, separate analysis for modular and nonmodular stems, and in standard and short implants, is presented.
Materials And Methods:
This retrospective registry study involved the analysis of data collected by the RIPO registry between 2000 and 2019. The study focused on THAs performed for primary hip osteoarthritis (OA) between 2000 and 2019. All patients treated by THA within this time frame and officially registered in the RIPO registry were included in the study. Exclusion criteria were: revision THAs, cemented implants, hemiarthroplasties, resurfacing procedures, megaprostheses for neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions, and THAs performed on patients residing outside the region.
Results:
A total of 12,010 cementless primary THAs using curved anatomic stems were performed in Emilia-Romagna between 2000 and 2019 and formally registered in the RIPO registry. The overall survival rate for anatomic standard stems was 96.7% at 10 years (96.1-97.3%); at 15 from the surgery, the survival rate dropped to 95.1% (93.9-96.1%). A total of 473 out of 12,010 recorded THA with anatomic stems (3.93%) experienced failure requiring revision surgery. The fixed standard stem showed the lowest failure rate (0.6%), while modular short stems had the highest (7.4%) at long-term follow-up. The most common stem-related complication was periprosthetic fracture (PF) in short stems (2.0% of cases) while in standard stems it was implant breakage (0.9% of cases); PFs were significantly more frequent in female patients (p = 0.0082), with a relative risk (RR) of 1.59 compared with male patients. Implant breakage demonstrated the highest rate of incidence among standard-modular stems (1.1% of cases).
Conclusions:
This registry-based study highlights that stem length and modularity significantly affect the long-term survival of anatomic femoral stems in THA. Fixed standard stems had the lowest failure rates, while modular short stems showed the highest failure rates and complications.
