Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Biomechanical Changes Related to Low Back Pain: An Innovative Tool for Movement Pattern Assessment and Treatment Evaluation in Rehabilitation
Published on: December 13, 2024
The Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A in Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review,
Waseem Wagrees1, Hesham Kelani2, Hazem Mohamed Salamah3
1Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Background:
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a leading cause of disability. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) has strong anti-spasmodic and analgesic effects, suggesting that its local muscular injection can reduce CLBP compared to other therapies. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A on patients with CLBP.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases for studies comparing BoNT-A to other therapies in terms of functional improvement and pain improvement as measured by visual analog scale (VAS) and clinically significant improvement in pain (50% or greater reduction in VAS score). We employed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to confirm the findings. The GRADE approach was employed to assess the overall quality of the evidence.
Results:
The search yielded nine studies, seven randomised clinical trials (RCTs), and two prospective observational studies. Compared to the control, BoNT-A increased the incidence of clinically significant improvement in pain (RR = 4.82, 95% CI (3.00, 7.76), p < 0.00001) and functional improvement (RR = 3.81, 95% CI (2.40, 6.04), p < 0.00001) (low-certainty evidence), and reduced VAS score (MD = -1.62, 95% CI (-3.13, -0.11), p = 0.04) (very low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analysis showed that BoNT-A is effective against normal saline (moderate-certainty evidence), and it was comparable to steroids and local anaesthetics (very low-certainty evidence). TSA confirmed the findings regarding clinical improvement in pain and functional improvement.
Conclusion:
BoNT-A is a tolerable and effective treatment for CLBP with a longer duration of action. Future high-quality studies are needed to confirm our findings.
Significance:
This paper provides good evidence that BoNT-A may be employed in patients suffering from resistant chronic low back pain not responding to normal saline injection due to its higher efficacy and longer duration of action. Compared to steroids and local anaesthetics injections, there is not enough data to draw a firm conclusion and future studies are needed.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Relaxants
Peripherally acting skeletal muscle relaxants interfere with the neurotransmission at the neuromuscular end plate to induce paralysis during...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Peripherally and Centrally Acting Muscle Relaxants: A Comparison
Centrally acting muscle relaxants can be further divided into spasmolytic and antispasmodic drugs. Spasmolytic...

