Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusions in patients with reduced left ventricular

Song Wen1, Chang Dai1,2, Zehan Huang1

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, Guangdong, China.

Heart and Vessels
|February 22, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Retrograde percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is safe for patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic total occlusion (CTO). Successful CTO recanalization improves survival, irrespective of LVEF.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery

Background:

  • Safety and prognostic implications of retrograde PCI in patients with low LVEF and CTO remain unclear.
  • This study assesses retrograde CTO PCI in patients with reduced LVEF (≤40%).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the procedural success and long-term outcomes of retrograde CTO PCI in patients with reduced LVEF.
  • To compare outcomes between patients with reduced and preserved LVEF.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 836 patients undergoing elective retrograde CTO PCI.
  • Comparison of patient and lesion characteristics, procedural details, and long-term outcomes between LVEF groups (≤40% vs. >40%).

Main Results:

  • High collateral channel tracking (93.5%), retrograde technical success (87.8%), and recanalization success (87.8%) were observed.
  • Patients with LVEF ≤40% had higher MACE (23.2%) including all-cause mortality (15.4%) and cardiac death (12.2%).
  • Reduced LVEF (≤40%) and age were independent predictors of MACE, while revascularization success was protective.

Conclusions:

  • Retrograde PCI is a safe and effective strategy for patients with reduced LVEF and CTO.
  • Successful CTO recanalization is associated with a significant survival benefit, regardless of LVEF.
Abstract