Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: Strategies for diagnosis at initial admission
Ahmet Melih Şahin1, Emrullah Ataş1, Sinan Çetin1
1Giresun University, Medical Faculty, Department of İnfectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Giresun, Turkey.
Insights
Early diagnosis of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) is crucial. This study identified key clinical and lab factors, including living in endemic areas, tick bites, and specific C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels, to predict CCHF at initial presentation.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) is a significant viral hemorrhagic fever with a broad differential diagnosis.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of CCHF is essential for appropriate patient management, including isolation and treatment protocols.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a predictive model for CCHF diagnosis using clinical and laboratory findings at the time of initial patient presentation.
- To identify independent risk factors and establish diagnostic cut-off values for CCHF.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 74 patients with confirmed CCHF and 43 patients with a preliminary CCHF diagnosis but ultimately negative.
- Multivariate logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis were employed to identify predictive variables.
- Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Independent risk factors for CCHF diagnosis included residing in an endemic area, history of tick bite, fever, C-reactive protein (CRP) < 48 mg/L, and procalcitonin (PCT) < 0.52 ng/mL.
- Specific cut-off values demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy: WBC 2485 mm³ (86% specificity), Neutrophil count 970 mm³ (93% specificity), CRP 48 mg/L (90.5% sensitivity), PCT 0.52 ng/mL (82.4% sensitivity).
- Higher in-hospital and 28-day mortality rates were observed in the non-CCHF group.
Conclusions:
- The study successfully identified key indicators for the early diagnosis of CCHF.
- Utilizing easily accessible laboratory tests (WBC, neutrophil count, CRP, PCT) with established cut-off values can significantly aid in diagnosing CCHF upon initial presentation in endemic areas.
- Accurate CCHF diagnosis facilitates prompt treatment and isolation, while also enabling earlier consideration of alternative diagnoses in non-CCHF patients, potentially improving outcomes for high-mortality conditions.
Abstract:
Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF) is a viral hemorrhagic fever common in many regions of the world. There are many diseases in the differential diagnosis of CCHF. In our study, we aimed to predict the diagnosis of CCHF at the time of initial presentation by using clinical and laboratory findings in patients with a preliminary diagnosis of CCHF. In our study, 74 patients with a definitive diagnosis of CCHF and 43 patients with a preliminary diagnosis of CCHF but not diagnosed with CCHF were compared in terms of demographic, clinical and laboratory findings. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve were used to determine variables to predict the diagnosis of CCHF. Living in an endemic area, tick bite, fever, CRP below 48 mg/L and PCT below 0.52 ng/mL were determined as independent risk factors for CCHF diagnosis. The specificity for cut off values of 2485 mm3 for WBC and 970 mm3 for neutrophil count were 86 % and 93 %, respectively. The sensitivity for cut off values of 48 mg/L for CRP and 0.52 ng/mL for PCT were 90.5 % and 82.4 %, respectively. In-hospital and 28-day mortality were higher in the non-CCHF group. The differential diagnosis of CCHF is important for planning appropriate isolation procedures and treatments for patients. Additionally, by excluding CCHF, it allows for the early consideration of other diseases in the non-CCHF group that show high mortality. In patients living in endemic areas with tick bites and clinical findings compatible with CCHF, easily accessible tests such as WBC, neutrophil count, CRP and PCT, within the cut-off values identified in our study, will assist in diagnosing CCHF at the initial presentation.
More Related Videos
09:52Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
07:40Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020