Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The <i>CTDP1</i> Founder Variant in CCFDN: Insights into Pathogenesis, Phenotypic Spectrum and Therapeutic Approaches.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Evaluating Emergency Department Transfers for Falls in Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Single-Site Observational Study of Witnessed and Unwitnessed Falls.

Journal of the American Medical Directors Association·2026
Same author

Evaluation of a thigh-worn accelerometer for detecting leg fidgeting and estimating its energetic cost via indirect calorimetry.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Development of a Fall-Specific Impact Testing Method to Evaluate Safety Helmet Performance and Injury Risk.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2025
Same author

Clinical Utility of [<sup>18</sup>F]-Fluciclovine PET/MRI for Differentiating True Progression from Treatment-Related Changes in Patients with Glioblastoma.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2025
Same author

Galectin-3 induces neurodevelopmental apical-basal polarity and regulates gyrification.

Science advances·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.0K

Comparison of Instrumented Mouthguard Post-Processing Methods.

Ryan Gellner1, Mark T Begonia2, Matthew Wood2

  • 1Virginia Tech (Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics), Blacksburg, VA, USA. gryan3@vt.edu.

Annals of Biomedical Engineering
|February 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Different data processing and labeling methods significantly alter head acceleration exposure metrics in ice hockey players. Standardizing these techniques is crucial for reliable research comparisons.

Keywords:
ArtifactHead impactInstrumented mouthguardLabelingPost-processingSalvage

More Related Videos

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.3K
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

2.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.0K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.3K
Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans
09:10

Precision of In Vivo Quantitative Tooth Wear Measurement Using Intra-Oral Scans

Published on: July 12, 2022

2.8K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Sports Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Instrumented mouthguards are increasingly used to measure head acceleration exposure in sports.
  • Existing research shows variability in post-processing and impact labeling methods across studies.
  • This inconsistency hinders direct comparison of head impact data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of various post-processing and labeling techniques on head acceleration exposure data.
  • To evaluate how different methods affect the statistical distribution of measured kinematics.
  • To assess the agreement and reliability of different impact event labeling approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Collected head acceleration data from 18 female adolescent ice hockey players over a full season.
  • Applied five distinct post-processing techniques to the raw sensor data.
  • Compared three labeling methods: manufacturer's label, a published coupling label, and a novel classification learner.

Main Results:

  • Post-processing methods demonstrably altered key exposure distribution metrics (mean, median, 95th percentile).
  • Labeling techniques exhibited low agreement on the selection of valid impact events.
  • Variations in labeling also influenced the descriptive statistics of the exposure data.

Conclusions:

  • Both post-processing and event labeling are critical factors in head acceleration studies.
  • Lack of standardization in methods impacts the comparability of research findings.
  • Researchers must clearly document their methodologies and strive for standardized approaches to improve data reliability and cross-study analysis.