Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

134
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
134
Behrens–Fisher Test00:57

Behrens–Fisher Test

62
The Behrens-Fisher test is a statistical method designed to address the Behrens-Fisher problem, which arises when comparing the means of two normally distributed populations with unequal variances. Unlike the Student's t-test, which assumes equal variances, the Behrens-Fisher test allows for mean comparison without this restrictive assumption. This flexibility makes it particularly valuable in scenarios where two independent samples exhibit normality but lack variance homogeneity.
This test...
62
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

2.7K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
2.7K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomized Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transurethral Resection for Staging New Bladder Cancers: Results From the Prospective BladderPath Trial.

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology·2025
Same author

Image directed redesign of bladder cancer treatment pathways: the BladderPath RCT.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2024
Same author

A constrained optimum adaptive design for dose finding in early phase clinical trials.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2024
Same author

Combined criteria for dose optimisation in early phase clinical trials.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Imbalance properties of centre-stratified permuted-block and complete randomisation for several treatments in a clinical trial.

Statistics in medicine·2016
Same author

Inference following designs which adjust for imbalances in prognostic factors.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2013

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K

Extension of Fisher's least significant difference method to multi-armed group-sequential response-adaptive designs.

Wenyu Liu1, D Stephen Coad2

  • 1Translational Epidemiology Unit, Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|February 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces adaptive clinical trial designs that improve treatment selection and patient allocation. These response-adaptive designs offer ethical and efficiency advantages over traditional methods while controlling statistical error rates.

Keywords:
Censored survival outcomedoubly-adaptive biased coin designefficient randomised-adaptive designerror-spending functionmultiple treatment comparisonoptimal allocation

More Related Videos

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.8K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.7K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Experimental Design

Background:

  • Multi-armed multi-stage designs are used in clinical trials for evaluating experimental treatments against a control.
  • Response-adaptive randomization enhances these designs by enabling early stopping and prioritizing promising treatments.
  • Existing frequentist designs can be conservative and lack power, especially for distinct therapies, and use fixed allocation ratios.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate Fisher's least significant difference method extended to group-sequential response-adaptive designs.
  • To demonstrate that information accrual continues after dropping inferior arms, allowing for error-spending approaches to control family-wise error rate.
  • To compare the operating characteristics of the proposed adaptive design with fixed-sample designs for normal and survival outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Mathematical derivation showing information accrual continuation after arm dropping.
  • Application of error-spending approach for family-wise error rate control.
  • Simulation studies and redesign of the NeoSphere trial to evaluate group-sequential response-adaptive designs for normal and censored survival outcomes.
  • Consideration of two optimal allocation strategies: one for efficient estimation and one for maximizing power.

Main Results:

  • The proposed group-sequential response-adaptive design controls the family-wise error rate effectively.
  • The adaptive design demonstrates efficient and ethical advantages compared to fixed-sample designs.
  • Simulation results confirm the favorable operating characteristics for both normal and survival data.

Conclusions:

  • Group-sequential response-adaptive designs offer significant advantages in clinical trials.
  • These adaptive designs provide a more powerful and efficient alternative to traditional fixed-sample designs.
  • The family-wise error rate is well-controlled, ensuring statistical validity in adaptive trial settings.