Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
Published on: January 16, 2019
From guideline to practice: three years of ICH S11 insights and recommendations
Diana Tavares1, Hsiao-Tzu Chien2,3, Maria Elzbieta Sheean1
1Paediatric Medicines Office, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Insights
The ICH S11 guideline effectively guides Juvenile Animal Studies (JAS) for pediatric medicines. Its weight-of-evidence approach promotes science-driven discussions, ensuring necessary safety data while adhering to ethical principles.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Toxicology
- Regulatory Science
- Pediatric Drug Development
Background:
- Juvenile Animal Studies (JAS) are crucial for ensuring the safe use of medicines in children.
- The International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) S11 guideline provides a framework for determining the need and design of JAS.
- The guideline emphasizes a weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of the ICH S11 guideline on non-clinical strategies for pediatric medicines in the European Union.
- To assess how the WoE approach influences regulatory discussions and decisions regarding JAS.
Main Methods:
- Review of 127 Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) approved between 2020 and 2023.
- Analysis of associated regulatory assessments and final non-clinical plans.
- Evaluation of discussions and outcomes related to the ICH S11 WoE approach.
Main Results:
- In 75% of PIPs submitted before JAS initiation, discussions using the ICH S11 WoE approach led to agreement on the non-clinical strategy.
- Disagreements on WoE analysis resulted in modifications to JAS in approximately a quarter of PIPs (addition, modification, or removal).
- The ICH S11 implementation facilitated science-driven dialogue on JAS necessity and design.
Conclusions:
- The ICH S11 guideline effectively promotes science-driven discussions on JAS within pediatric drug development.
- Consideration of developmental aspects, toxicity relevance, and clinical context improves regulatory alignment.
- The WoE approach supports generating essential safety data while upholding the 3Rs (replacement, reduction, refinement) in non-clinical studies.
Abstract:
Juvenile Animal Studies (JAS) may be warranted to ensure the safe clinical use of medicines for children. The ICH S11 guideline was developed to guide the need for and design of JAS, and proposes a weight-of-evidence (WoE) approach. We evaluated how the introduction of the guideline shaped the non-clinical strategy for paediatric medicines in the European Union. Our review included Paediatric Investigation Plans (PIPs) for 127 products approved between 2020 and 2023, along with the associated regulatory assessment and final non-clinical plans. Although in 12 of selected PIPs a JAS was already ongoing or completed at the time of submission, in all other cases (115/127), the PIP was submitted before the initiation of JAS. In 75% (86/115) of these procedures the discussions based on the ICH S11 WoE approach led to an agreement on the proposed non-clinical strategy. In approximately a quarter of PIPs, there was disagreement on the outcome of the WoE analysis leading to the addition (3%), modification (10%), or removal (11%) of JAS. Our review indicates that the implementation of ICH S11 facilitates science-driven discussions about the necessity and design of JAS within the broader non-clinical strategy. A thorough consideration of developmental aspects of the product's pharmacological target, the clinical relevance of notable toxicity findings, and the clinical context of the medicine's use fosters effective dialogue and improves regulatory alignment. The WoE approach in ICH S11 ensures that relevant safety information is generated to support paediatric drug development while balancing the principles of non-clinical replacement, reduction and refinement (the 3Rs).
More Related Videos
09:02Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
05:43Author Spotlight: Improving Lesion Contiguity in Pulmonary Vein Isolation via Proactive Esophageal Cooling
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security: