Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

An Anaerobic Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Mercury and Cadmium
Published on: December 17, 2018
Bioavailability and risk assessment of metals in freshwaters: is global regulatory implementation keeping pace with
Graham Merrington1, Robert W Gensemer2, Guy Gilron3
1wca environment Ltd, Faringdon, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
Abstract:
The scientific knowledge that enables the prediction of potential aquatic ecological risks due to exposure of metals based on freshwater chemistry data has been available for several decades. As a result, ecosystems can be protected using frameworks and procedures incorporated into regulatory approaches. Yet when evaluating how freshwater risks from metals are assessed globally, it is apparent that regulatory jurisdictions differ in their progress and approaches when accounting for bioavailability. It is entirely reasonable and appropriate for a lag in time between the development of the science and its incorporation into routine regulatory environmental protection. We openly acknowledge that this is not just a regulatory challenge and take a more holistic view of the implementation of the science that informs metal bioavailability. Implementation comprises the steps required to utilize science and knowledge to enable its practical, beneficial, and routine application in regulatory decision-making. Different regulatory jurisdictions have taken varied approaches to account for metal bioavailability. We have made specific use of frameworks that utilize limit values, such as water quality guidelines, criteria, and quality standards, to illustrate the similarities and differences in the implementation of bioavailability. Approaches taken in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, and the United States were reviewed and evaluated. Although some of these approaches or parts thereof have been successful, other aspects have been less so. In this evaluation, we have identified key commonly encountered obstacles and challenges in these approaches to the implementation of metal bioavailability. Finally, we provide an evidence-driven "road map" to the successful regulatory implementation of metal bioavailability in risk assessment drawn from successful components of the approaches reviewed. The application of this framework will enable regulatory jurisdictions to readily keep pace with the science pertaining to metal bioavailability and avoid the challenges experienced by others.
More Related Videos
10:44Clean Sampling and Analysis of River and Estuarine Waters for Trace Metal Studies
Published on: July 1, 2016
08:46Dose Uptake of Platinum- and Ruthenium-based Compound Exposure in Zebrafish by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry with Broader Applications
Published on: April 21, 2022
Related Concept Videos
The Periodic Table and Organismal Elements
Drug Regulation