Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

03:07
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
406
Quantitative Evaluation of Debris Removal from NiTi Rotary Endodontic Instruments After Different Cleaning Procedures
Luigi Generali1, Paolo Generali1, Pio Bertani2
1Department of Surgery, Medicine, Dentistry and Morphological Sciences with Transplant Surgery, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Relevance (CHIMOMO), University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41124 Modena, Italy.
Dentistry Journal
|February 25, 2025
Summary
Standardized cleaning protocols for endodontic instruments are lacking. A combination of manual, ultrasonic, and steam sterilization cleaning was most effective, but complete debris removal remains a challenge.
Area of Science:
- Dental instruments
- Sterilization and decontamination
- Endodontics
Background:
- Endodontic instruments require effective decontamination and sterilization for patient safety.
- Current protocols for cleaning nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files lack standardization.
- Assessing debris removal is crucial for ensuring instrument safety and treatment success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of different cleaning protocols in removing debris from used NiTi rotary endodontic files.
- To compare the effectiveness of steam sterilization alone, ultrasonic cleaning plus steam sterilization, and manual cleaning plus ultrasonic cleaning plus steam sterilization.
- To identify optimal cleaning strategies for endodontic instruments.
Main Methods:
- Forty-eight Mtwo NiTi rotary instruments were used and divided into four groups.
- Protocols included: negative control (new sterile), steam sterilization only, ultrasonic cleaning + steam sterilization, and manual cleaning + ultrasonic cleaning + steam sterilization.
- Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fiji software were used to quantify debris on file surfaces.
Main Results:
- The negative control group (new instruments) had the least debris, while steam sterilization alone showed the most debris.
- No significant debris differences were found between manual + ultrasonic + steam sterilization and ultrasonic + steam sterilization groups.
- Higher debris accumulation was observed from coronal to apical sections in control and steam sterilization only groups.
Conclusions:
- A comprehensive cleaning approach combining mechanical, chemical, and ultrasonic methods is superior for debris removal from endodontic instruments.
- Existing cleaning protocols are insufficient for complete debris removal.
- Further research is needed to standardize protocols, or consider single-use instruments.

