Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2025

Bronchial Thermoplasty: A Novel Therapeutic Approach to Severe Asthma
Published on: November 4, 2010
The impact of biologic therapy on work capacity and workforce attachment in patients with severe asthma
Kjell Erik Julius Håkansson1, Rikke Ibsen2, Niels Steen Krogh3
1Deparment of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Introduction:
Severe asthma impacts work capacity, but little is known about the effects of biologic therapy on patients' ability to work. We aimed to assess the impact of biologic therapy for severe asthma on work capacity and workforce attachment.
Methods:
This cohort study used the Danish Severe Asthma Register, comprising all Danish patients with severe asthma initiating biologic therapy. Earned income, hours worked, and workforce attachment were tracked in national databases from one year prior to biologic therapy as well as during 2 years of biologic therapy. Outcomes were compared to age-, sex-, cohabitation- and residence-matched controls from the general population.
Results:
Overall, 381 patients aged 20-62 years (52% females) were included. Annual weeks worked were lower among patients with severe asthma (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 0.82 (0.80-0.84)), driven by increases in sick leave (aIRR 2.77 (2.58-2.98)), unemployment (aIRR 1.38 (1.30-1.46)) and disability pension (aIRR 1.85 (1.76-1.94)). After initiating biologic therapy, patients saw modest increases in annual hours worked during the second year of treatment (aIRR 1.03 (1.03-1.04)). However, patients remained at risk for temporary (OR 1.83 (1.15-2.93)) and permanent (OR 2.67 (1.16-6.16)) workforce withdrawal. Patients achieving on-treatment remission worked significantly more hours compared to non- and clinical responders and had lower unemployment-, sick-leave and disability pension rates both at baseline and after two years.
Conclusion:
Biologic therapy resulted in a modest increase in hours worked, yet patients remain at significant risk of early workforce withdrawal. Patients achieving remission had a stronger attachment to the workforce, also prior to biologic therapy.
More Related Videos
00:07Home-Based Prescribed Pulmonary Exercise in Patients with Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Published on: August 24, 2019
09:26Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Antiasthma Drugs: Inhaled Corticosteroids and Glucocorticoids
ICS work through a multifaceted mechanism of action. They suppress the inflammatory response caused by the proliferation of TH cells. They also reduce the transcription of the IL-2 gene, which is involved in the...
Antiasthma Drugs: β2-Adrenoceptor Agonists
One class of bronchodilators includes β2-adrenoceptor agonists. These agents target the β2-adrenoceptors located on bronchial smooth muscle cells. By stimulating these receptors, β2-agonists induce...
COPD: Management Using Bronchodilators and Corticosteroids
Antiasthma Drugs: Leukotriene Modifiers
Leukotriene modifiers work through two distinct mechanisms: