The role of human errors and violations in pedestrian-related crashes: Harnessing a unique database and accounting...

Human factors are often major contributors to pedestrian crashes. However, police-reported pedestrian-involved crash data often have gaps in crash details. Overcoming this limitation, the Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Data Tool (PBCAT) provides a more comprehensive high-quality database capturing the sequence of events.

In addition to human and roadway environmental factors, there could be unobserved factors (e.g., pedestrian conspicuity, impact speed, or riskiness by a driver) that could be either unavailable or not used in the analysis; however, these unobserved factors could have a significant influence on pedestrian injuries. This study applies finite mixture models to address unobserved heterogeneity in pedestrian injuries which is usually overlooked. As a result, the associations of one or more of the observed factors with pedestrian injuries across different latent (unobserved) classes can be different.

Harnessing this unique database for North Carolina reveals that in most (95%) of the crashes (N=24,886) occurring between 2009 and 2019, pedestrians were either killed or injured. Risky behaviors by drivers and pedestrians contributed to 7.91% and 50.59% of these crashes, respectively. Recognition errors (e.g., dash or dart-out) and violations (e.g., failure to yield) by pedestrians contributed to 22.08% and 28.58% of crashes, respectively. Recognition errors and violations by drivers contributed to only 2.12% and 3.11% of crashes respectively each of which is significantly lower than those by pedestrians. Results of the ordered Probit model indicate that the chance of pedestrian fatality is significantly higher if a pedestrian makes recognition errors and violations, a driver makes performance errors, and either the pedestrian or driver is impaired.

The finite mixture model shows that pedestrians belong to two latent groups across which there is significant heterogeneity in pedestrian injuries and variations in the associations of observed factors with pedestrian injuries. The practical implications are discussed in the paper.