Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

The Creation of a Rat Model for Osteosarcopenia via Ovariectomy
Published on: February 21, 2025
The effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate supplementation in patients with sarcopenia: A systematic review and
Wen-Tao Gu1, Lu-Wen Zhang2, Fu-Hua Wu3
1Research Institute of Public Health, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China; Tianjin Key Laboratory of Food Science and Health, Key Laboratory of Special Diet Nutrition and Health Research, China National Light Industry, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Objectives:
To undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the evidence base for the effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation in patients with sarcopenia.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods:
The literature was searched via the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, WANFANG, CNKI and VIP databases, through 23rd February 2024. The inclusion criteria were: randomized controlled trials (RCTs); patients diagnosed with sarcopenia defined according to well-accepted clinical consensus; HMB as an intervention; outcomes on muscle mass and/or muscle strength and/or physical performance. Data extraction was completed by independent pairs of reviewers. Meta-analyses of continuous outcomes were performed on the extracted data. Standard mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) between treatment and control group were used to express intervention effect estimates of HMB for each study. Risk of bias was assessed according to Version 2 of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials (ROB 2).
Results:
Of 196 records retrieved and screened, five RCTs met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative analysis, yielding 154, 359 and 359 participants for muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, respectively. For the overall risk of bias, no studies were graded as "high risk of bias", one (20.0 %) as "some concerns", and four (80.0 %) as "low risk of bias" according to the ROB 2. The overall meta-analysis revealed a beneficial effect on muscle mass and strength, as demonstrated by a higher skeletal muscle mass index (SMD = 0.32; 95 % CI: [0.00,0.64]; Z value =1.98; P = 0.048), along with an elevated handgrip strength (SMD = 0.65; 95 % CI: [0.05, 1.25]; Z value = 2.12; P = 0.034) in the HMB intervention groups compared with the control groups. However, there was no evidence of a benefit on physical performance, assessed by gait speed (SMD = 0.19; 95 % CI: [-0.14, 0.53]; Z value = 1.14; P = 0.255).
Conclusion:
Overall, although limited and requiring interpretation with utmost caution, current evidence indicates that HMB supplementation is beneficial for improving muscle mass and strength, but there is no evidence of a benefit on physical performance in patients with sarcopenia. In future, more well-designed HMB intervention trials should be conducted that include populations diagnosed with sarcopenia according to well-accepted clinical consensus.
More Related Videos
13:35Segmentation and Linear Measurement for Body Composition Analysis using Slice-O-Matic and Horos
Published on: March 21, 2021
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017