Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

05:49
Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
Published on: February 23, 2024
756
Validity and Reliability of Intraoral Optical Coherence Tomography and Bitewing Radiography for Detecting Approximal
Michaela Strumpski1, Hartmut Schneider2, Claudia Rüger2
1Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Periodontology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany, michaela.strumpski@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Caries Research
|February 25, 2025
Summary
Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) shows higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting approximal caries than digital radiography (DR). This advanced imaging technique offers a promising alternative for early caries detection in clinical settings.
Area of Science:
- Dental Diagnostics
- Biomedical Imaging
- Caries Research
Background:
- Approximal carious lesions pose a diagnostic challenge in dentistry.
- Traditional methods like bitewing radiography have limitations in detecting early-stage demineralization.
- Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) presents a novel imaging modality for dental applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SD-OCT in detecting approximal carious lesions.
- To compare the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT with digital radiography (DR).
- To assess the reliability and reproducibility of SD-OCT in a simulated clinical environment.
Main Methods:
- Extracted human teeth with varying caries severity (ICDAS II scores 0-3) were used in an in vitro study.
- Digital radiography (DR) and an intraoral SD-OCT probe were employed for imaging.
- Histology and microtomography (µCT) served as the gold standard for validation.
- Multiple calibrated raters assessed image interpretability and agreement.
Main Results:
- SD-OCT demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.66-0.91) and specificity (0.67-0.92) compared to DR (Sensitivity: 0.46-0.82; Specificity: 0.33-0.58).
- Intrarater agreement for SD-OCT was moderate to substantial, while DR showed fair to substantial agreement.
- Interrater agreement was fair to substantial for SD-OCT and slight to substantial for DR.
Conclusions:
- SD-OCT is a more sensitive tool than DR for detecting early approximal carious lesions in a simulated clinical setting.
- The diagnostic performance of SD-OCT was not compromised in terms of specificity or reproducibility.
- Further clinical investigations are warranted to validate these promising findings in real-world patient care.

