Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.3K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.3K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.7K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.7K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

92
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
92
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

171
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and...
171
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

3.8K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.8K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

2.5K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation of the Anchor-Based Indirect Comparison Method for Equivalence Margin Derivation in Biosimilar Development.

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Rejoinder to the 'Letter to the Editor' on "Group-by-Treatment Interaction Effects in Comparative Bioavailability Studies".

The AAPS journal·2024
Same author

Correction: Group-by-Treatment Interaction Effects in Comparative Bioavailability Studies.

The AAPS journal·2024
Same author

Group-by-Treatment Interaction Effects in Comparative Bioavailability Studies.

The AAPS journal·2024
Same author

Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction potential of treosulfan using a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling approach.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2021
Same author

The potential of the estimands framework for clinical pharmacology trials: Some discussion points.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.7K

Trial Probability of Success for Testing 3-Way PK/PD Similarity With Multiple Endpoints.

Rachid El Galta1, Susanne Schmitt1, Ramin Arani2

  • 1Hexal (Sandoz), Holzkirchen, Germany.

Pharmaceutical Statistics
|February 25, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an assurance method to improve sample size calculations for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) similarity trials. The method accounts for uncertainty in treatment differences, enhancing the reliability of study power estimates.

Keywords:
PK/PD equivalenceassurancebiosimilarsmultiple comparisonsprobability of successstatistical power

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

17.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.4K
Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells
09:32

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Analysis and Quantification of Intratumoral PD-1+ Tim-3+ CD8+ T Cells

Published on: February 8, 2018

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Pharmacometrics
  • Biostatistics
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) similarity trials are crucial for biosimilar drug development.
  • These trials often involve complex designs with multiple coprimary endpoints and 3-way treatment comparisons.
  • Current sample size calculations may not adequately address uncertainty in treatment differences and variability, potentially impacting study power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate the assurance method for sample size determination in PK/PD similarity studies.
  • To address the uncertainty associated with treatment differences and variability in multiple coprimary endpoints.
  • To provide a practical tool for enhancing the reliability of study power estimations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of an assurance method to handle multiple comparisons in PK/PD similarity trials.
  • Proposal of a strategy for eliciting joint prior distributions using historical data.
  • Implementation of methods in an R shiny application utilizing Monte Carlo simulations.

Main Results:

  • The assurance method provides a more reliable estimation of study power by accounting for parameter uncertainty.
  • The proposed methods enhance the understanding of power in complex PK/PD similarity study designs.
  • A real data example demonstrates the practical utility and application of the assurance method.

Conclusions:

  • The assurance method offers a valuable complement to conditional power in sample size considerations for PK/PD similarity studies.
  • Incorporating assurance methods can lead to more robust and reliable study designs.
  • This approach improves the accuracy of power calculations, crucial for regulatory submissions.