Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancing 3D Modeling for Enhanced Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules in Early-Stage Lung Cancer
Published on: October 13, 2023
A Novel Automated Algorithm to Identify Lung Cancer Screening from Free Text of Radiology Orders.
Alison S Rustagi1,2, Marzieh Vali3,4, Francis J Graham4
1Center for Data to Discovery and Delivery Innovation (3DI), San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA. Alison.rustagi@va.gov.
An automated algorithm accurately identifies lung cancer screening (LCS) scans in electronic health records. This tool improves the reliability of LCS studies by distinguishing screening from diagnostic imaging.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Radiology
- Public Health
Background:
- Lung cancer screening (LCS) is recommended for asymptomatic individuals.
- Administrative codes used for LCS may inaccurately include tests for symptomatic patients.
- Accurate identification of screening tests is crucial for unbiased research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate an automated algorithm for identifying lung cancer screening (LCS) among asymptomatic patients.
- To differentiate between screening and diagnostic low-dose chest CT scans using electronic health data.
- To improve the accuracy of identifying LCS in large patient populations.
Main Methods:
- Developed and iteratively refined an algorithm using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and free text from radiology orders.
- Analyzed a national population-based sample of 4503 adults aged 65-80 within the Veterans Health Affairs primary care system.
- Evaluated algorithm performance (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV) against manual chart review as the gold standard.
Main Results:
- The algorithm achieved 97% sensitivity and 79% specificity in identifying LCS-eligible individuals.
- Administrative codes misclassified 31% of LCS scans, while the algorithm correctly identified 95% of screening scans.
- The algorithm demonstrated high positive predictive value (90%) and negative predictive value (93%) in the overall population.
Conclusions:
- An automated algorithm can accurately distinguish screening from diagnostic chest imaging, essential for unbiased non-randomized LCS studies.
- This validated algorithm enhances the reliability of analyzing LCS outcomes.
- Further research should evaluate the accuracy of administrative codes for LCS in diverse healthcare systems.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...

