Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025
09:07
Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
9.0K
Jumping to Conclusions: Mechanisms of Cognitive Control in Decision-Making Under Uncertainty
Pei-Chun Shih1, África Pérez-Santiago1,2, Daniel Peña2
1Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 26, 2025
Summary
This study reveals that individuals who gather more evidence before deciding exhibit better cognitive control. Higher uncertainty increases reliance on cognitive flexibility for adaptive decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Science
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Cognitive control is vital for goal-directed behavior, aiding attention, impulse inhibition, and adaptation.
- Deficits in cognitive control are linked to jumping to conclusions (JTC), making decisions with insufficient evidence.
- Cognitive stability and flexibility are key components of cognitive control, influencing decision-making processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between evidence-gathering patterns in decision-making and cognitive control mechanisms.
- To examine how cognitive stability and flexibility relate to jumping to conclusions (JTC) under varying uncertainty levels.
- To identify distinct profiles of evidence gathering and their association with cognitive control in university students.
Main Methods:
- 200 university students participated, completing the Box Task (measuring JTC) under different uncertainty conditions.
- Cognitive stability and flexibility were assessed using the Flanker-Simon Task and Letter-Number Task, respectively.
- Cluster analysis identified evidence-gathering profiles, and BIS/BAS questionnaire data was collected.
Main Results:
- Three evidence-gathering profiles (minimal, moderate, extensive) were identified through cluster analysis.
- Individuals with extensive evidence gathering demonstrated superior cognitive control (stability and flexibility).
- Increased uncertainty heightened the use of cognitive flexibility, while cognitive stability remained unaffected.
Conclusions:
- Superior cognitive control is associated with more thorough evidence gathering.
- Cognitive flexibility plays a crucial role in adapting decision-making under high uncertainty.
- Findings highlight the complex interplay between uncertainty, cognitive control, and decision biases, suggesting avenues for intervention research.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Decision Making
83
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
83
01:37Reason and Intuition
6.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.3K
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
5.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.2K
01:25The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
01:08The Availability Heuristic
5.9K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
5.9K