Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy01:25

Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy

42
The colon, or large intestine, is the final segment of the digestive system. Its primary functions include absorbing water and vitamins produced by gut bacteria and transforming waste from liquid to solid to form stool. In adults, the large intestine is approximately 5 feet long and consists of four main sections:
42
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy01:26

Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy

36
This lesson explores three gastrointestinal imaging techniques: radionuclide testing, colonic transit studies, and virtual colonoscopy.
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and...
36

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics to study gastric carcinogenesis: pathophysiological molecular characterization.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Computer-aided detection in surveillance colonoscopy: a population-based randomized trial.

Endoscopy·2026
Same author

PolyDeep Advance 3: Randomized Clinical Trial comparing PolyDeep-assisted and conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection rate in a colorectal cancer screening program.

Endoscopy·2026
Same author

Clinical features and therapeutic requirements of perianal disease in adult patients with ulcerative colitis: the PERICO study of the ENEIDA registry.

Inflammatory bowel diseases·2026
Same author

Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence After Adenoma and Serrated Polyp Removal: Results From the Colonprev Trial.

United European gastroenterology journal·2026
Same author

Colonoscopy versus biennial FIT screening: a post hoc sustained-strategy analysis of the COLONPREV Trial.

Gut·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.2K

PolyDeep Advance 1: Clinical Validation of a Computer-Aided Detection System for Colorectal Polyp Detection with a

Pedro Davila-Piñón1,2, Teresa Pedrido1, Astrid Irene Díez-Martín1,2

  • 1Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense (REGGIOu), Hospital Universitario de Ourense, 32005 Ourense, Spain.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 26, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study found that the AI system PolyDeep and expert endoscopists have comparable diagnostic performance for detecting colorectal polyps during colonoscopy, suggesting AI can aid in polyp detection.

Keywords:
FITcolonoscopycomputer-aided detectiondetectionperformancepolypsscreening colonoscopysurveillance

More Related Videos

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.7K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

203

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
06:28

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

Published on: August 1, 2019

8.2K
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
15:49

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System

Published on: October 16, 2013

31.7K
Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

203

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence

Background:

  • Colorectal polyps are precursors to cancer, necessitating accurate detection during colonoscopy.
  • Computer-aided detection (CAD) systems, like PolyDeep, show promise for improving in vitro polyp detection.
  • Comparing CAD systems with expert endoscopists is crucial for evaluating their clinical utility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the diagnostic performance of expert endoscopists and the PolyDeep CAD system for colorectal polyp detection.
  • To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of both approaches for various lesion types, including diminutive and neoplastic polyps.

Main Methods:

  • A unicentric diagnostic test study (PolyDeep Advance 1) utilized a second observer design.
  • Endoscopists performed colonoscopies blinded to PolyDeep's real-time detection results.
  • Key endpoints included sensitivity and specificity for detecting colorectal polyps, diminutive lesions, neoplasia, and adenomas.

Main Results:

  • The study included 205 patients undergoing colonoscopy.
  • PolyDeep identified 6.8% more lesions than endoscopists alone, with 26 additional lesions confirmed.
  • No statistically significant differences were observed in sensitivity or specificity between endoscopists and PolyDeep for overall polyp detection, diminutive lesions, neoplasia, or adenoma detection.

Conclusions:

  • Expert endoscopists and the PolyDeep CAD system demonstrate similar diagnostic performance in detecting colorectal polyps.
  • The findings suggest that AI systems like PolyDeep can serve as valuable adjuncts to human expertise in colonoscopy.
  • Further research may explore the integration of CAD systems to enhance adenoma detection rates and patient outcomes.