Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

What is a Species?

What is a Species?

Genetics of Speciation

Genetics of Speciation

Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.

Formation of Species

Formation of Species

Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.

Asexual Reproduction

Asexual Reproduction

Asexual reproduction allows plants to reproduce without growing flowers, attracting pollinators, or dispersing seeds. Offspring are genetically identical to the parent and produced without the fusion of male and female gametes.

Gene Flow

Gene Flow

Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.

Law of Segregation

Law of Segregation

When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The genetic architecture of floral trait divergence between hummingbird- and self-pollinated monkeyflower (Mimulus) species.

The New phytologist·2024

Same author

A Comparison of Non-Destructive Visceral Swab and Tissue Biopsy Sampling Methods for Genotyping-by-Sequencing in the Freshwater Mussel <i>Fusconaia askewi</i>.

Genes·2023

Same author

Genetic structure in Louisiana Iris species reveals patterns of recent and historical admixture.

American journal of botany·2021

Same author

Effect of preservation on fish morphology over time: Implications for morphological studies.

PloS one·2019

Same author

Asymmetric introgression between fishes in the Red River basin of Texas is associated with variation in water quality.

Ecology and evolution·2019

Same author

Integrating Bayesian genomic cline analyses and association mapping of morphological and ecological traits to dissect reproductive isolation and introgression in a Louisiana Iris hybrid zone.

Molecular ecology·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses

Published on: June 16, 2020

Does Asymmetric Reproductive Isolation Predict the Direction of Introgression in Plants?

Noland H Martin¹, Alexander S Zalmat¹, Bailey S Ellis¹

¹Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX 78666, USA.

|February 26, 2025

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Asymmetries in reproductive isolation do not predict the direction of introgression between plant species. Further research should focus on hybrid fitness and ecological factors to understand introgression patterns.

Keywords:

asymmetric introgression asymmetric reproductive isolation gene flow hybrid zones natural hybridization plant speciation

More Related Videos

Mating and Tetrad Separation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for Genetic Analysis

Mating and Tetrad Separation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for Genetic Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2009

Author Spotlight: A High-Resolution, Single-Grain, In Vivo Pollen Hydration Bioassay for Arabidopsis thaliana

Author Spotlight: A High-Resolution, Single-Grain, In Vivo Pollen Hydration Bioassay for Arabidopsis thaliana

Published on: June 30, 2023

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 25, 2025

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses

Determination of Self- and Inter-incompatibility Relationships in Apricot Combining Hand-Pollination, Microscopy and Genetic Analyses

Published on: June 16, 2020

Mating and Tetrad Separation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for Genetic Analysis

Mating and Tetrad Separation of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for Genetic Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2009

Author Spotlight: A High-Resolution, Single-Grain, In Vivo Pollen Hydration Bioassay for Arabidopsis thaliana

Author Spotlight: A High-Resolution, Single-Grain, In Vivo Pollen Hydration Bioassay for Arabidopsis thaliana

Published on: June 30, 2023

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Plant speciation
Genetics

Background:

Reproductive isolation (RI) maintains species boundaries by reducing interspecific hybridization.
Asymmetries in RI and introgression are common in hybridizing plant taxa.
Understanding introgression direction is crucial for evolutionary studies.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if asymmetries in total reproductive isolation predict the direction of introgression in naturally hybridizing plants.
To analyze the relationship between asymmetric RI and asymmetric introgression using meta-analysis.

Main Methods:

Conducted a meta-analysis of 19 plant species pairs with data on asymmetric total RI and introgression.
Performed a comprehensive literature review to identify relevant studies.
Utilized a two-tailed binomial test to assess the association between RI asymmetry and introgression direction.

Main Results:

No significant relationship was found between asymmetries in total reproductive isolation and the direction of introgression (p = 0.3593).
Asymmetric reproductive isolation does not reliably predict the direction of genetic material transfer via introgression.

Conclusions:

Asymmetric RI is not a strong predictor of introgression direction in plants.
Introgression patterns are better explained by factors like hybrid fitness, mating behaviors, and ecological/demographic influences within hybrid zones.