Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026
Multispectral Real-time Fluorescence Imaging for Intraoperative Detection of the Sentinel Lymph Node in Gynecologic Oncology
Published on: October 20, 2010
Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Cervical Cancer: Challenges in Resource-Limited Settings with High Prevalence of
Szilárd Leó Kiss1, Mihai Stanca1, Dan Mihai Căpîlna2
1First Obstetrics and Gynaecology Clinic, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, 540142 Targu Mures, Romania.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Cervical cancer primarily disseminates through the lymphatic system, with the metastatic involvement of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes significantly impacting prognosis and treatment decisions. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is critical in guiding surgical management. However, resource-limited settings often lack advanced detection tools like indocyanine green (ICG). This study evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of SLN biopsy using alternative techniques in a high-risk population with a high prevalence of large tumours. Methods: This prospective, observational study included 42 patients with FIGO 2018 stage IA1-IIA1 cervical cancer treated between November 2019 and April 2024. SLN mapping was performed using methylene blue alone or combined with a technetium-99m radiotracer. Detection rates, sensitivity, and false-negative rates were analysed. Additional endpoints included tracer technique comparisons, SLN localization patterns, and factors influencing detection success. Results: SLNs were identified in 78.6% of cases, with bilateral detection in 57.1%. The combined technique yielded higher detection rates (93.3% overall, 80% bilateral) compared to methylene blue alone (70.4% overall, 40.7% bilateral, p < 0.05). The sensitivity and negative predictive values were 70% and 93.87%, respectively. Larger tumours (>4 cm), deep stromal invasion, and prior conization negatively impacted detection rates. False-negative SLNs were associated with larger tumours and positive lymphovascular space invasion. Conclusions: SLN biopsy is feasible in resource-limited settings, with improved detection rates using combined tracer techniques. However, sensitivity remains suboptimal due to a steep learning curve and challenges in high-risk patients. Until a high detection accuracy is achieved, SLN mapping should complement, rather than replace, pelvic lymphadenectomy in high-risk cases.
