Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2025

An Inertial Measurement Unit Based Method to Estimate Hip and Knee Joint Kinematics in Team Sport Athletes on the Field
Published on: May 26, 2020
Running Parameter Analysis in 400 m Sprint Using Real-Time Kinematic Global Navigation Satellite Systems
Keisuke Onodera1,2,3, Naoto Miyamoto3, Kiyoshi Hirose3,4
1Faculty of Education and Welfare, Biwako-Gakuin University, 29 Fusecho, Higashiomi 527-8533, Japan.
Real-time kinematic global navigation satellite systems (RTK GNSS) offer a new way to measure running parameters like step length and frequency. A velocity minima method using RTK GNSS provides accurate, drift-free sprint analysis for training optimization.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Sports Science
- Navigation Systems
Background:
- Accurate measurement of running parameters (step length, step frequency, velocity) is crucial for optimizing sprint performance.
- Traditional methods like 2D video analysis and inertial measurement units (IMUs) have limitations in precision and practicality for outdoor settings.
- Real-time kinematic global navigation satellite systems (RTK GNSS) present a potential alternative for high-frequency kinematic data acquisition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce and evaluate two novel methods for estimating running parameters using 100 Hz RTK GNSS.
- To compare the accuracy and reliability of these RTK GNSS methods against established 3D video analysis and IMU data.
- To assess the suitability of RTK GNSS for detailed per-step sprint analysis, including curved sections and stride asymmetry detection.
Main Methods:
- Two methods for estimating running parameters were developed using 100 Hz RTK GNSS data.
- Method 1 identified mid-stance via vertical position minima; Method 2 utilized vertical velocity minima aligned with initial contact.
- Measurements were validated against 3D video analysis and IMU data during 400 m sprints by collegiate sprinters.
Main Results:
- Both RTK GNSS methods successfully estimated step frequency, step length, and velocity.
- Method 2 (vertical velocity minima) demonstrated superior accuracy with lower RMSE for SF (0.205 Hz vs. 0.291 Hz) and SL (0.143 m vs. 0.190 m) compared to Method 1.
- Method 2 showed higher correlation with reference data, better performance on curves, and more consistent detection of stride asymmetries.
Conclusions:
- RTK GNSS, particularly the velocity minima approach (Method 2), provides a robust, drift-free, single-sensor solution for per-step sprint analysis.
- This RTK GNSS method offers a practical and accurate alternative to IMU-based systems for outdoor running analysis.
- The findings support the use of RTK GNSS for enhanced training optimization and performance evaluation in track and field athletes.
More Related Videos
08:26Comparative Analysis of Lower Limb Kinematics between the Initial and Terminal Phase of 5km Treadmill Running
Published on: July 17, 2020
10:28Kinematics and Ground Reaction Force Determination: A Demonstration Quantifying Locomotor Abilities of Young Adult, Middle-aged, and Geriatric Rats
Published on: February 22, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Types of Global Positioning System Surveys
Introduction to Global Positioning System
Errors in Global Positioning System
Field Application of Global Positioning System
Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device