Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.4K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.4K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

14.2K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.2K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

13.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
13.9K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

11.6K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
11.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Implementation of Competency-Based Medical Education in Surgical Training: A Scoping Review.

Journal of surgical education·2026
Same author

Investigating a Model to Predict Milestones From Entrustable Professional Activity Levels for Medicine-Pediatrics Residents.

Academic pediatrics·2026
Same author

A scoping review of inquiry in medicine and nursing using Dewey's perspective.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2026
Same author

The reliability of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand viva examination.

Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine·2026
Same author

What could we learn from team sports? Cohesion as a lens to understand research teams in health professions education.

Medical education·2026
Same author

Validity Evidence for the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Milestones and Associations With American Board of Pediatrics Certification Examinations Among US Fellows, 2015-2022.

AEM education and training·2026
Same journal

Ten-year outcomes from the Columbia-Bassett program: a model for strengthening the underserved health workforce.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence teaching assistants: a scalable solution for supporting struggling medical students.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

MDCU MedUMORE: a national digital platform for equitable and lifelong medical education in Thailand and beyond.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

The Minority Ophthalmology Mentoring Program: A Model for Increasing Diversity in Surgical Specialties.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Toward a global ecosystem for health professions education: harnessing open educational resources and generative AI with shared governance.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
Same journal

Associations of marital status with well-being and career intentions among medical residents: a national survey in Japan.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Characterizing Research Teams.

Meredith E Young, Tim Dubé, Daniel J Schumacher

    Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
    |February 26, 2025
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Effective health professions education research relies on carefully composed teams. Understanding the different types of research teams ensures the right expertise is matched to scholarly goals for optimal knowledge generation and integration.

    More Related Videos

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
    06:18

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

    Published on: October 20, 2022

    2.0K
    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: May 25, 2025

    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
    14:14

    The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

    Published on: May 13, 2022

    5.8K
    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
    06:18

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

    Published on: October 20, 2022

    2.0K
    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
    06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Health Professions Education
    • Scholarly Research
    • Team Science

    Background:

    • Health professions education (HPE) research is frequently conducted by interdisciplinary teams.
    • Collaborative efforts are essential for addressing complex problems and advancing scholarly goals in HPE.
    • Optimal team composition is crucial for effective knowledge generation and integration.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe the characteristics of research teams in health professions education.
    • To delineate four distinct types of research teams based on their composition and function.
    • To provide guidance on matching team composition to specific research objectives.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of existing research on team science and collaboration in HPE.
    • Categorization of research teams into four distinct types.
    • Analysis of team composition, goals, and operational strategies.

    Main Results:

    • Identification and description of four types of research teams.
    • Analysis of the 'who, what, how, and when' for each team type.
    • Emphasis on the importance of aligning team structure with research aims.

    Conclusions:

    • Strategic team formation is vital for successful HPE research.
    • Understanding different research team models facilitates effective collaboration.
    • This framework aids in optimizing team dynamics for knowledge advancement in HPE.