Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 25, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Characterizing Research Teams

Meredith E Young, Tim Dubé, Daniel J Schumacher

    Academic Medicine : Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
    |February 26, 2025
    PubMed
    Abstract

    More Related Videos

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm06:18

    The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

    Published on: October 20, 2022

    2.0K
    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior06:48

    The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

    Published on: January 19, 2019

    9.3K

    Related Concept Videos

    Naturalistic Observations02:30

    Naturalistic Observations

    If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
    15.4K
    Group Design02:01

    Group Design

    The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
    8.9K
    Robbers Cave04:49

    Robbers Cave

    During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
    14.2K
    Stereotype Content Model02:16

    Stereotype Content Model

    The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
    13.9K
    Ethics in Research01:56

    Ethics in Research

    Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
    22.9K
    Case Studies01:22

    Case Studies

    There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
    11.6K